Scottish Executive ministers at the start of the millennium believed that appealing to the "innate common sense of the public" would be key to achieving their plans to scrap the controversial section 28 law, newly-declassified documents have suggested.
A series of previously-confidential papers reveals how the then cabinet of the Labour/Lib Dem coalition at Holyrood felt it had to take decisive action to move the debate away from "hysterical" and "extremely damaging" coverage of its proposals to repeal the law which banned the promotion of homosexuality in schools.
And they outline ministers' fears from the time that the "highly vocal" campaign to maintain the status quo could impact upon the Executive's wider social policy agenda.
The law, which was part of the Local Government Act 1988, stipulated that local authorities should "not intentionally promote homosexuality" or "promote the teaching in any maintained school of the acceptability of homosexuality as a pretended family relationship''.
It was repealed by the Scottish Parliament in June 2000 following a heated campaign from both sides of the argument in what was commonly known as the "section 28" or "clause 2A" debate.
Documents just released by National Records of Scotland under the 15-year rule chart the then Scottish cabinet's evolving approaches to the issue from late 1999 onwards in the face of strong opposition from some quarters.
Minutes from a cabinet meeting on January 18, 2000 show how there was believed to be a "rough balance" between members of the public in favour and against the plans to abolish the law. It was proposed during the meeting that ministers take a "non-provocative stance" on the issue.
But just one week later, first minister Donald Dewar noted the "increasingly hysterical tone of the media coverage" of the issue, further minutes record.
"The key was to find a way of appealing to the innate commonsense (sic) of the Scottish public. Parents should be reassured by the safeguards proposed and the knowledge that if they had concern about a teacher's behaviour or material being used in schools, they could take action."
The minutes went on: "There was a risk that a wider agenda could emerge from the campaign, attacking social policies on matter such as health promotion, family law reform and social inclusion... The possible impact of the current campaign on the wider social policy agenda should be kept under close review."
MSPs passed the Marriage and Civil Partnership (Scotland) Bill in February 2014, making Scotland the 17th country in the world to legalise same-sex ceremonies.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel