THE Scottish Government is under increased pressure to establish an inquiry into the operation of undercover police officers in Scotland.
A public probe, the Pitchford Inquiry, was set up to look into police infiltration of political and social justice groups in England and Wales over more than 40 years.
Scottish justice secretary Michael Matheson wrote to the Home Office in December asking it to confirm that the Pitchford Inquiry will look at "any activity in Scotland conducted by English and Welsh forces".
It follows allegations in some newspapers that some officers spied on activists during the 2005 G8 summit at Gleneagles, Perthshire.
But Scottish Liberal Democrat justice spokeswoman Alison McInnes says a similar inquiry should be commissioned by the Scottish Government into the alleged actions of those officers who worked in Scotland.
It came as one MSP questioned what the chief constable of Police Scotland knew about the actions of undercover police when he worked for the Metropolitan Police.
MSPs were debating the behaviour of undercover police as part of a members' debate at Holyrood.
Phil Gormley, who was sworn in as chief constable of Police Scotland this week, was in charge of the Met’s Special Branch, which had responsibility for the disgraced Special Demonstration Squad (SDS).
He said he knew "nothing at all" of the allegations at the time.
The Pitchford inquiry was set up in July after a slew of revelations about officers spying on left-wing, environmental and animal rights activists.
Several undercover cops had sexual relationships with the women they were spying on and one even fathered a child while concealing his true identity.
The Metropolitan Police in November made an “unreserved apology” and agreed to compensate even women who were deceived into having relationships by officers - behaviour the force now admits was “unacceptable” and “a violation of the women’s human rights”.
The inquiry remit does not currently cover Scotland, being formally set out "to inquire into and report on undercover police operations conducted by English and Welsh police forces in England and Wales since 1968".
Ms McInnes said: “The allegations that have been made against the officers in question are serious and the revelations have resulted in serious emotional trauma for those who feel duped by them.
“The police-public interaction in these circumstances has shocked us all, it is the kind of behaviour that transgresses professional and moral boundaries and flies in the face of common decency. It is in fact the kind of behaviour that threatens the very legitimacy of policing.
“The Scottish Government has said it is supportive of widening the Pitchford enquiry to include activities in Scotland, but does not believe that there should be a separate Scottish inquiry.
"Citizens are entitled to expect the highest standards of policing and rightly expect that there should be clear justification and authorisation of any clandestine policing. Equally those officers engaged in undercover policing should be carefully regulated and trained and regularly assessed.
“Can we guarantee that has always been in place in Scotland? Is it in place now? We don’t know, and that is why an open and unflinching examination of the extent of undercover policing past and present and its governance and oversight here in Scotland is necessary - to learn lessons and establish clear terms of engagement.
Community safety and legal affairs minister Paul Wheelhouse said he was not aware of evidence that Scottish officers authorised those involved in the inquiry.
He agreed that the Pitchford Inquiry should be extended to include any activity by Met Police units in Scotland, but said the use of undercover officers by the Scottish force was "very different" to that elsewhere.
The Scottish Government was approached for comment.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel