THE organisers of a petition signed by hundreds calling on BBC Scotland to remove senior sports reporter Chris McLaughlin from his job are subject of a police probe.
Some have questioned the petition which was linked to a Bears Fightback blog set up on January 17.
Police Scotland are looking into a Bears Fightback blog, which was the subject of a complaint.
The blog said: "To all the haters, heed this warning. Your articles and comments are being noticed. We will notify the club of any untruths, inaccuracies or unfair treatment. If the club are unwilling to take action then we will.
"We will look into the history of each and every individual or company embroiled in this hate fest, and we will look to hurt you in any way legally possible. If you lose your business, your home, your husband or wife, your children or your freedom, don't say you weren't warned."
Police Scotland have confirmed they are looking into the content of the blog which was promoted on a Bears Fightback Twitter account.
A spokesman said: "It has been reported to the police. We are aware and we are looking into it."
The blog has since been removed.
Some fans distanced themselves from the blog, while others dismissed them.
One blogger talking about any possible police probe said: "My guess? Nothing will be done because absolutely no crime has been committed, none!"
The blogger added: "It is still a blog with little taste and for me, it reflected badly on the author but what on earth was happening? "
Journalist Jim Spence, formerly BBC Scotland sports reporter, was amongst those who were vocal in their disgust at the blog comments.
The petition on Change.org in the name of Bears Fightback calling for Mr McLaughlin to be removed has received around 500 supporters in 24 hours.
The BBC imposed a boycott after the broadcaster was told two weeks ago that the reporter was again not welcome at Ibrox.
There was no BBC reporter at Ibrox on Saturday when Rangers beat Livingston 4-1.
The Bears Fightback petition complained that the BBC did not send a reporter to “the third most attended football match in the UK, and the most attended match in Scotland on January 16th 2016 due to this employee being banned from the stadium."
It added: "This is unacceptable."
The petition goes on: "This 'journalist' is banned because he has proved on multiple occasions that he cannot conform to the BBC guidelines on Impartiality."
Fans previously lodged their concerns about a previous BBC boycott which began with the club's 3-0 victory over Peterhead at the beginning of August. last year.
Mr McLaughlin was told he was not welcome after being accused of filing misleading and unbalanced reports by Rangers.
Some fans protested to the BBC and to the communications regulator Ofcom about the boycott saying the BBC actions were indicative of what they felt was a continued bias against the club.
BBC sources then insisted there would be no staff member going to Ibrox until the ban on Mr McLaughlin is lifted and they would rely on agency staff.
The BBC insisted they had no choice but to take action after Mr McLaughlin was told to stay away.
Rangers has previously said its concerns with coverage came to a head after a BBC report 'unfairly focused' on the arrest of Rangers fans after the club’s 6-2 win over Hibs.
The BBC dropped the nearly month-long boycott of Ibrox in August after Rangers agreed to drop a ban on the reporter following talks.
Rangers said it had reimposed the ban on Mr McLaughlin two weeks ago saying: "This is about balance and fairness. It is Rangers' view that after having asked for, and having been promised, exactly that - nothing more, and certainly not favour from this or any other reporter - it has not been forthcoming.
"The BBC know they are welcome but once again they, in their wisdom, have chosen not to attend Ibrox thereby denying licence payers the opportunity to see and hear from Rangers on a publicly-funded platform which is supposed to be for everyone. Rangers fans are entitled to ask if this is an abuse of the BBC's privileged position."
The deleted Bears Fightback blog
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel