The cyber attack on TalkTalk which resulted in the personal data of tens of thousands of people being accessed, was a "car crash" which should send a warning to the industry, a watchdog has said.
Information Commissioner Christopher Graham said the data breach should "put the fear of God" in to other telecoms firms and make them check their own systems for vulnerabilities.
"Any other company with half a brain should be checking their systems now to make sure they don't land up in the same situation," he told MPs.
The details of almost 160,000 customers were accessed following the attack on October 21, and five people have been arrested in connection with it.
Mr Graham told the Culture, Media and Sport select committee his office was carrying out six investigations into the telecoms firm, including the probe into the October 2015 incident.
"The key message has really got to be to companies - 'there but for the grace of God', see what a car crash there was," he said.
"TalkTalk is just an example of what could go wrong."
Mr Graham added that although his office could only impose fines of up to £500,000, the real damage was to the reputation of firms found not to have taken care of sensitive data.
"It is very clear that consumers place a very high priority on the security of their personal information with companies, and they pick and choose," he said.
"When they form a view that a company isn't taking things seriously they simply shop elsewhere."
He added: "This is the big threat of our times and certainly should be high on the risk register but companies should be taking active steps to test their own systems, see whether they can break into their own system from outside."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here