A health watchdog has told people there is no such thing as a safe tan, as the actor Hugh Jackman announced his fifth skin cancer has been removed.
The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (Nice) said adults need between six and eight teaspoons (35ml) of sun cream per application and should always aim for an SPF of 15 or higher.
It comes as Jackman took to Twitter and Instagram to warn fans of the dangers of not wearing sun cream.
An example of what happens when you don't use sunscreen. Basal cell. Mildest form of cancer. USE SUNSCREEN PLEASE !! pic.twitter.com/phQsRS5QiI
— Hugh Jackman (@RealHughJackman) February 8, 2016
He also appealed to people to get regular skin checks as he posted a picture of himself with a plaster on his nose after having a fifth skin cancer removed.
He had his first skin cancer removed in 2013 after his wife, Deborra-Lee Furness, suggested he should get a mole on his nose checked.
At the time, he wrote on social media: “Deb said to get the mark on my nose checked. Boy, was she right! I had a Basal Cell Carcinoma. Please don’t be foolish like me. Get yourself checked. And USE sunscreen!!!”
In its new guidance, Nice said “there is no safe or healthy way to get a tan from sunlight”, adding that a tan provides little protection against further exposure to the sun.
Hugh and his wife Deborra in 2015 (Dennis Van Tine/PA )
And it said while people should expose their arms and legs to the sun for short periods in order to build up vitamin D, this had to be balanced against the risks of skin cancer.
It stopped short of recommending a specific amount of time people should stay out without sun cream to build up vitamin D, but said experts agreed that “short (less than the time it takes for skin to redden or burn), frequent periods of sunlight exposure are best for vitamin D synthesis”.
It said this type of exposure is also “less likely to result in skin cancer”.
Gotta love @SuperBowl Sunday! @Panthers @Broncos @coldplay @ladygaga @Beyonce @BrunoMars – ain't nothin' like it! pic.twitter.com/g94qB82wxR
— Hugh Jackman (@RealHughJackman) February 8, 2016
Many adults in Britain have low levels of vitamin D (23% aged 19 to 64 and 21% aged 65 and over), as do 14% of children aged four to 10 and 22% of children aged 11 to 18.
In the wide-ranging guidance, Nice warns that applying sunscreen too thinly reduces the amount of protection it gives.
Higher SPFs – such as 30 – may offer better protection but do “not necessarily mean people can spend more time in the sun without the risk of burning”.
Nice said sunscreens should be “re-applied liberally, frequently and according to the manufacturer’s instructions”, including after being in the water (even if it is water-resistant) and after towel drying, sweating or when it may have rubbed off.
September 1972 on babe watch. #ThrowbackThursday pic.twitter.com/1FcBWHT2T0
— Hugh Jackman (@RealHughJackman) February 4, 2016
Sunscreen should also be applied twice if people are going to be out long enough to risk burning – once half an hour before going out, and again around the time they go out in the sun.
Sarah Williams, Cancer Research UK’s health information manager, said: “While we all need some sun for vitamin D, it’s important not to overdo it as the sun’s UV rays also increase skin cancer risk.
“Far from being a sign of health, a suntan actually means your skin is trying to protect itself from too much UV – and sunburn means that the DNA in your skin cells has been damaged. Over time, this damage can build up and lead to skin cancer.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here