A Scot called William Wallace has challenged Alex Salmond to a fight live on air.
Mr Wallace, 75, who now lives in Brentwood in Essex, also said that the ex-SNP leader's pro-independence push made him "sick".
Mr Wallace rang in to Mr Salmond’s LBC radio phone-in to accuse the former First Minister of holding “England to ransom” over the financing of extra powers for Holyrood.
And he told him: ”I will have a fight with you any time”.
In response, Mr Salmond suggested that Mr Wallace’s anti-independence stance was not in keeping with his famous namesake.
The two men appeared to get off to a bad start when Mr Salmond commented on the caller's name, asking: “What are you doing in Brentwood?”
“What are you doing in London? ” came the reply.
On the ongoing finance row, Mr Wallace asked: “You are just holding England to ransom, aren’t you? When are you going to have another vote about leaving? That’s what you are up to, isn’t it?”
Mr Salmond denied that he was holding anyone to ransom, saying that all parties had agreed there would be "no detriment to Scotland’s finances”.
Mr Wallace went on to say that Mr Salmond’s push for independence “makes me sick. Because my grandad lost his life in the First World War... fighting for Britain. He was not fighting just for Scotland.”
Mr Salmond replied that his own father, 94, had fought in the Second World War.
Trying to move the discussion back to Scotland's finances, he claimed that George Osborne was "trying to pockle Scotland’s money”.
But Mr Wallace told him that he was talking to a “street guy” and challenged him to a fight.
Mr Salmond replied: “I’m glad you are in Brentwood not in Aberdeen, that’s for sure”.
The SNP MP for Gordon also told listeners that when he first met his wife she was a Conservative.
He also said that he did not think Donald Trump would win the republican nomination for President, despite the controversial tycoon's victory in the New Hampshire primary this week.
Mr Salmond also suggested that he was sympathetic to calls for councils to ban taxi service app firm Uber.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel