Dragons' Den star Sarah Willingham has spoken of her fears that children are not being equipped with vital skills to help them learn the value of money.
The businesswoman and mother-of-four said pocket money should be "earned, not expected," as new research found that 85% of parents who hand out pocket money say their children do not always have to do anything in return for it, such as doing chores.
The survey, released by credit checking company Experian, also found that parents rank celebrities above teachers as having a bigger influence on children's attitudes and behaviours when it comes to money.
While 68% of parents ranked themselves as having a big influence, 14% opted for celebrities, and just 10% opted for teachers.
Willingham told the Press Association that money skills are essential for children, so that when they eventually gain their first taste of independence and are offered credit, they can make good decisions.
She said: "What looks like free money, that's the problem. And with no plan of how you're going to pay it off.
"There's nothing wrong with credit when it's done properly. In the business world it's often essential. You've got to be able to deal with it and understand what it is that you're getting into.
"All we can ever do is give our children the tools to be able to make educated decisions. And what scares me is that we're not giving them the tools to make those educated decisions."
The survey found that 10 to 14-year-olds were the most likely to have to earn their pocket money, although 81% of parents with children of this age said their children do not always have to earn their cash handouts.
Fifteen to 18-year-olds were the least likely to have to earn their pocket money, with 88% of parents of children in this age group saying they do not necessarily have to perform chores in return for cash.
Meanwhile, 86% of parents with children aged between five and nine who give pocket money said their children do not always earn the money.
More than half (59%) of parents who give their children pocket money do so every week, forking out £8.07 on average.
But one in 10 (10%) parents give out pocket money when their child asks for it - handing out £54.31 typically per time.
Willingham has worked with Experian to develop a free app called Jangle, which is aimed at children aged between seven and 11 years old and teaches them how to manage their money and save towards goals. The app has been quality marked by charity pfeg (Personal Finance Education Group).
The businesswoman said she would "never forget" the value of the money she earned from doing a paper delivery round as a youngster.
She said that the earlier parents start to introduce money skills to their children, the better, adding: "We (should) start to encourage good behaviour with money and teach children to have a very good and happy relationship with money very, very early on."
Willingham said that pocket money is a great way to start showing children how finances work.
She said: "By encouraging kids at a really young age to earn that money, not just handing it out, and to save for things is a great place to start, because often that conversation is child-led.
"I also think shopping is a brilliant (way of teaching children about money). I often say to my kids: 'Oh, can you go and get me some plain flour... bring me the cheapest,' or: 'Which of these tomatoes shall we get?'."
She added: "There are all sorts of ways kids can earn their pocket money, from washing the car to walking dogs - whatever works for you as a family. But the point is that pocket money should be earned not expected."
Willingham also said that financial know-how is vital for budding entrepreneurs.
She said: "I think it's cooler than ever to be an entrepreneur... we're seeing more and more mums get into it as well, which is fantastic.
"But again... it's just knowing where to go to get that help. It's knowing where to even start. It's there, it's just knowing which door to knock on."
More than 1,500 parents from across Britain with children aged from five to 18 years old took part in the research.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here