Sirhan Sirhan, the assassin of Democratic presidential candidate Robert Kennedy in 1968, has been denied parole for the 15th time.
Sirhan, 71, had a suitability hearing at a jail near San Diego, the California Board of Parole Hearings said. He will be up again for parole in five years.
Palestinian-born Sirhan is serving a life sentence for gunning down Kennedy, 42, at the Ambassador Hotel in Los Angeles on June 5, 1968.
The shooting occurred minutes after the US senator from New York and former U.S. attorney general gave his victory speech after winning the California Democratic primary. Kennedy died the next day.
Sirhan was sentenced to death in 1969. His sentence was commuted to life in prison after California banned the death penalty.
Paul Schrade, a 91-year-old Kennedy confidant and among the five people wounded in the shooting, told the board Sirhan should be granted parole since evidence showed a second gunman killed Kennedy.
"The evidence clearly shows you were not the gunman who shot Robert Kennedy," Mr Schrade said in remarks prepared for the hearing.
Sirhan fired in front of Kennedy but the candidate was struck in the back by three bullets, including a fatal shot to the back of the head, Schrade said.
An analysis of an audio recording shows that 13 shots were fired but Sirhan's gun held only eight rounds and he had no chance to reload, Mr Schrade said.
Mr Schrade alleged misconduct in the investigation by the Los Angeles Police Department and called for a new probe of Kennedy's killing.
A federal judge last year rejected similar arguments by Sirhan's lawyers, who had sought to have him released, saying he was innocent.
Sirhan has said that he had no recollection of the killing, although he has also said he had fired at Kennedy because he was enraged by his support for Israel.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here