JK Rowling has accepted an apology from Scots MP Natalie McGarry seemingly bringing to an end a three weeks impasse after becoming embroiled in a social media row.
But there was no obvious sign that Ms McGarry, who resigned the SNP whip last year, would comply with the author's request to provide a donation to her children’s charity, Lumos.
Ms McGarry, who resigned the SNP whip last year following allegations of missing cash from the accounts of the organisation Women For Independence, turned her Twitter settings to private after the spat with Ms Rowling
But last Saturday she began commenting publicly once more on the micro-blogging site.
But nearly all the independent Glasgow East MP's historical tweets were no longer available, including her messages in the online row with the Harry Potter author.
Ms McGarry wrote: “Regards a previous discussion with JK Rowling, I apologise for using a screen grab which didn’t give context to the conversation.
“The particular screen grab from JK Rowling didn’t give the correct context to her relationship with a tweeter, so for that, I apologise.
“In the context of my last two tweets, I give and continue to give and donate to charities and organisations in Glasgow East and abroad.”
A spokesman for Ms Rowling: "JK Rowling accepts Natalie McGarry’s apology and is pleased the matter has now been drawn to a close.
"We’re not in a position to comment with regards the charity donation."
The author's agent had previously written to Ms McGarry seeking an apology and a charitable donation.
A spokesman for the author said immediately after the spat that "at present" JK Rowling is not taking legal action against Natalie McGarry.
"Instead, her agent has written to Ms McGarry spelling out the consequences of defamation on Twitter, and requesting an apology and a donation to JK Rowling’s children’s charity, Lumos," the spokesman said.
The writer repeatedly challenged the MP to explain how she has "defended misogyny and abuse" and demanded an apology in a social media row that lasted six hours.
Ms Rowling had raised the prospect of potential legal action after facing the accusation that she supported the Twitter user.
In conversation with Ms McGarry, she wrote: “You aren’t some random hater, Natalie. You’re an elected politician and you’ve accused me of supporting abuse and misogyny.”
During the Twitter spat, Ms McGarry apologised for "any misguided inference" that Ms Rowling supported misogyny or abuse.
But then she subsequently retweeted an image that had been altered to wrongly suggest Ms Rowling had responded "you're a good man" to an offensive tweet sent by a Tweeter operating anonymously.
Later on, she added: “You don’t appear to understand how Twitter or defamation works. I’m going to help you out with the latter.”
Ms McGarry's online accusations came about after she discovered Ms Rowling conversing with the anonymous tweeter who the MP claimed was a troll. The tweeter was also being followed on Twitter by the author.
Ms McGarry resigned the SNP party whip last November after police named her as part of their investigation into allegations that £30,000 of donations had gone missing from WFI. Ms McGarry, who co-founded WFI in 2012, denied any wrongdoing.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article