Poppers should not be included in a crackdown on so-called legal highs because they are not "psychoactive", Government advisers have said.
Selling the party drug has been earmarked for criminalisation under new laws which come into force next month.
The Psychoactive Substances Act will introduce a blanket ban on the production, distribution, sale and supply of new psychoactive substances (NPSs).
In a letter to the Home Office, the Advisory Council on the Misuse of Drugs (ACMD) said in its view poppers do not fall within the scope of the current definition of a psychoactive substance in the legislation.
Consequently, there is no need for the substance to be exempted, it added.
The Home Secretary has the power to make amendments to a list of exempted substances under the Act.
The ACMD said its "consensus view is that a psychoactive substance has a direct action on the brain and that substances having peripheral effects, such as those caused by alkyl nitrites, do not directly stimulate or depress the central nervous system."
Poppers, the name given to a group of chemicals called alkyl nitrites, are popular among gay men. They are normally sniffed from a bottle, producing a short head-rush.
In 2011, the ACMD concluded that misuse of the drug "is not seen to be capable of having 'harmful effects sufficient to constitute a social problem'".
Its letter, published on Wednesday, said the opinion "remains valid".
It added that reports of ocular damage, although rare, are "serious" and should be carefully monitored, while the use of poppers may be more risky for people with heart conditions or abnormal blood pressure.
Minister Karen Bradley said: "The landmark Psychoactive Substances Act will fundamentally change the way we tackle new psychoactive substances - and put an end to the game of cat and mouse in which new drugs appear on the market more quickly than Government can identify and ban them.
"We have noted the advice of the Advisory Council on the Misuse of Drugs and we intend to respond shortly."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here