George Osborne has signalled an embarrassing retreat over cuts to disabled benefits in the face of a major revolt by Tory MPs.
The Chancellor responded to another wave of criticism over plans to curb Personal Independence Payments (PIP) by insisting the Government would consult charities "to make sure we get this right".
A Government source later indicated that ministers wanted to kick the changes - initially announced by Work and Pensions Secretary Iain Duncan Smith - into the "long grass".
"This is going to be kicked into the long grass. We need to take time and get reforms right, and that will mean looking again at these proposals," the source said.
"It is not an integral part of the Budget - it is a DWP package that came out beforehand."
The source said the Government was not "wedded" to figures in the Budget that suggested the shake-up of assessment criteria would shave around £1.3 billion a year off the PIP bill.
"We are not wedded to specific sums - it is about making sure that what will be an increasing amount of money goes to those who need it most," they added.
Answering questions at the conclusion of a European Council summit in Brussels earlier, Mr Cameron said that welfare payments to disabled people had increased by £4 billion in real terms during his time in office.
The PM said: "We will always protect the most vulnerable people in our country and make sure they get the help they need.
"We are going to discuss what we've put forward with the disability charities and others, as the Chancellor said today, and make sure that we get this right. It's important."
Mr Osborne has come under intense pressure from Tory backbenchers and Labour over the planned cut, with critics claiming it is unfair to press ahead with the move at the same time as reducing taxes for the wealthy and businesses.
Opposition leader Jeremy Corbyn said 200,000 of the 640,000 people hit by the changes would lose out altogether as a result of the Government's plans.
He told BBC Radio 5 Live: "It is utterly appalling what they are proposing. We will be forcing a vote in Parliament on this. I hope and believe all opposition parties will join with us in that.
"I believe a number of Conservative MPs are so upset about this they too will vote against the Government."
Conservative backbencher Andrew Percy, who has organised a letter to the Chancellor calling for a U-turn, warned that the Government - which has a working majority of just 17 - faces defeat in the Commons if it tried to push through the changes.
Backbencher William Wragg became the latest Conservative to register his concern about the plan, putting his name to Mr Percy's letter and saying the "PIP changes need a rethink".
The climbdown came as it emerged that the Treasury is also moving to avert Conservative rebellions on two other fronts.
The Government will legislate next week to abolish the so-called "tampon tax".
Mr Cameron secured agreement in Brussels that EU rules on setting VAT levels would be made more flexible.
But rather than face losing a Commons vote on the issue Mr Osborne has opted to change the law to zero rate sanitary products now, instead of waiting for the looser regulations to take effect.
The Treasury has also insisted VAT rates on solar panels and energy saving measures will not be raised despite EU edicts.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel