CHILDREN under 12 will avoid being saddled with criminal records for the offences they commit under plans for a landmark change in the law.
The age at which a young offender can be held responsible for a crime is set to be raised from the current threshold of eight after the government's own advisors recommended an overhaul "at the earliest opportunity".
Scotland currently has the lowest age of criminality in Europe and was urged to increase it by the United Nations eight years ago.
In 2012 the Scottish Government pledged to address the issue but an advisory group set up by ministers only began its examinations last November.
The group included senior figures from Police Scotland, charities, Social Work Scotland, Scotland’s children’s commissioner and the Scottish Children’s Reporters’ Administration.
Its report, which is expected to be implemented, said: “Scotland has been criticised for having an age of criminal responsibility which is the lowest in Europe.
“As such, the Advisory Group approached an increase in the age of criminal responsibility to 12 years old not from the perspective of if it should happen, but rather how and when it should happen."
Under 12s who have already been convicted of offences are likely to see their criminal records wiped clean under the proposals and will no longer be compelled to declare them.
Member of the advisory team, Dr Claire Lightowler, who is director of the Centre for Youth and Criminal Justice at Strathclyde University, said new research now suggests young people do not make socially responsibly decisions until they reach 16 at the earliest.
But many who fail to develop these skills until later in life have usually experienced trauma, neglect, maltreatment or domestic abuse, she said.
“The vast majority of children involved in offending have experienced such issues and are the most vulnerable and victimised of young people in Scotland," said Dr Lightowler.
And she said: “The evidence also suggests that adding the label of ‘offender’ to a child makes their continued involvement in offending more likely.”
New police powers may be necessary to ensure that in the most serious circumstances children can be taken to a place of safety, potentially in the absence of their parents or carers.
At present children in Scotland aged under 12 cannot be prosecuted but can be required to attend a children’s hearing where they can be held legally responsible for a crime. This could mean acquiring a criminal record which can affect opportunities in later life.
Scotland’s commissioner for children and young people Tam Baillie welcomed the consultation while Paul Carberry, the director of children’s services at Action for Children, said the report was a "positive step forward".
He said: “In Scotland we have a system envied around the world through taking a progressive, welfare-based approach towards children at risk or in trouble. "However, the criminalising of 8-11 year olds is inconsistent with this approach.
“No 8-11 year old should ever be regarded as a ‘criminal’ nor should they be stigmatised in later life as a result of their actions as a child.”
Victim Support Scotland was represented on the group but said the rights of victims "should not be compromised due to the age of the offender".
Lib Dem MSP Alison McInnes, who unsuccessfully attempted to raise the age of criminal responsibility through an amendment to the Criminal Justice Bill last year, welcomed the report but accused the Scottish Government of dragging its heels.
Ms McInnes said: “For years the SNP have sat on their hands and allowed children as young as eight to be criminalised. Many are now stuck with criminal records until they die, which ruins their life chances.
“The SNP rejected innumerable opportunities and attempts from Scottish Liberal Democrats to change the law.”
Ministers are not taking a position on whether the law should change and have launched a consultation on the issue, which will conclude after the Holyrood election.
A Scottish Government spokesperson said: “We will consider all views put forward and an announcement on any reform of legislation will be made in due course.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here