Alex Salmond has hit back at David Cameron's claim there is "zero" Scottish steel in the new Forth Road Bridge - saying there is some in the girders.
The Prime Minister, who has come under fire for his government's treatment of the UK steel industry, made the comment came after SNP MP Marion Fellows accused him of viewing Scottish jobs as "expendable".
Mr Cameron told to MPs that when it came to Scottish steel the replacement crossing contained "absolutely nothing".
He said: "It is worth asking how much Scottish steel was in the Forth Road Bridge - zero, none, absolutely nothing, yes.
"What a contrast with the warships that we're building, that of course we wouldn't be building if we had an independent Scotland.
"So we back the steel industry with actions as well as words," he added.
Later Mr Salmond corrected the Prime Minister in the Commons.
The former SNP leader told MPs: "I know that the Prime Minister would be incredibly anxious... to acknowledge that actually 45 per cent of the total orders of £540 million were placed with Scottish companies.
"I know that the Prime Minister would want to correct the misleading impression there was no Scottish steel in the contract by acknowledging that steel from the Dalzell plate mill was in the girders at either end of the bridge.
"And I fully understand the Prime Minister would want to acknowledge that the reason there was no Scottish bidder for the main sub contract was the closure of the Ravenscraig Steel Mill by a previous Tory Government in the 1990s removing our capacity to supply such steel."
The former First MInister also asked Speaker John Bercow to consider a "new innovative Prime Ministerial correction procedure" to give Mr Cameron the opportunity to "rapidly correct any misleading impressions he inadvertently gives".
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel