SCOTLAND'S chief law officer has said there is a "realistic possibility" of a second trial over the murder of 270 people in the Lockerbie bombing.
Last year it emerged that two Libyans had been identified as official suspects by Scottish and US prosecutors over the 1988 Lockerbie bombing in their investigation.
The Crown Office in Edinburgh confirmed at the time that Scotland’s chief prosecutor, lord advocate Frank Mulholland, had issued a formal international letter of request to the Libyan attorney general asking for permission to interview both men.
Now Mr Mulholland has said in discussing the prospect of fresh prosecutions over Britain's biggest mass murder: "I said it takes time, and it will take time, and that's certainly something which we are used to in relation to the Lockerbie inquiry.
"If we get to the stage of seeking the extradition of two named individuals or indeed more persons, I think there's a realistic possibility that there could be a further trial."
READ MORE: Lockerbie suspect was almost tried, says former FBI agent
The Crown Office have not named the two new suspects, but they are believed to be Abdullah al-Senussi, Gaddafi’s brother-in-law and former head of intelligence, who was in a Libyan jail sentenced to death.
The other was said to be Abu Agila Mas'ud who is also in a Libyan jail serving a ten year sentence. He had been identified as the suspected bomb-maker.
Further suspects have included Nasser Ali Ashour, an intelligence officer who supplied the IRA with explosives and weapons in the 1980s and Ken Dorstein, an American documentary film-maker whose brother was killed in the bombing.
Mas’ud was named in the original indictment in 1999 against Abdelbaset al-Megrahi, the only person convicted of the attack, who died in May 2012 after being released by the Scottish government on compassionate grounds in 2009.
Abdelbaset al-Megrahi
"We're currently at a stage where there are a number of outstanding international letters of request, one of which is seeking the permission of the Libyan authorities to interview two named individuals as suspects," Mr Mulholland told STV.
READ MORE: Lockerbie Revealed: The secret report that damns Scottish justice
"Following all the work that's been going on, and it's been painstaking, it's taken some time, it does take time.
"I hope that the Libyans will grant permission for that to be done. I obviously can't say too much publicly but a lot of work is going on behind the scenes to make that happen.
"What I hope is that this will bear fruit and we can take it to the next stage of seeking the extradition of the two named individuals."
The lord advocate acknowledged any new Lockerbie trial would involve a public re-examination of the disputed evidence from Megrahi's.
"I don't fear that," he said. "I think that's a good thing. Without seeking to comment on what the outcome would be, I think the evidence would stand up to a further test.
"We wouldn't be doing this unless we thought that the evidence was sufficiently credible and reliable to have them interviewed as suspects, I think that's the best way to put it."
Campaigners for some Lockerbie victims insist that Libya has been wrongly accused of the bombing. Megrahi died proclaiming he was innocent.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel