Veteran British filmmaker Ken Loach has won the Palme D’Or at the Cannes Film Festival for his latest film I, Daniel Blake, the second time he has clinched the prestigious prize.
The 79-year-old director and veteran left-wing activist took the top accolade at the international film festival for his story of a former Newcastle joiner who struggles in the welfare system after becoming ill.
Cérémonie de Clôture/Awards Ceremony #Cannes2016 #Palmedor pic.twitter.com/pN45DcKfYH
— Festival de Cannes (@Festival_Cannes) May 22, 2016
Ken has had 12 films in competition at the Cannes Film Festival through his long career, including The Wind That Shakes The Barley, which took the Palme D’Or in 2006.
The filmmaker, whose past classics include 1969′s Kes, was up against a host of international stars for the prize. They included Spanish Oscar-winner Pedro Almodovar, Sean Penn and Paul Verhoeven.
Ken Loach (Joel Ryan/AP/PA)
He was not the only British winner at Cannes – Andrea Arnold’s road movie American Honey, starring Shia LaBeouf, won the Prix du Jury (Jury Prize).
Ben Roberts, director of the BFI Film Fund said: “What a moment for British cinema, and for two important and humane films with so much to say.
“Bravo to Ken and to Andrea and their collaborators – including the unstoppable Robbie Ryan who shot both films. This is cinema from the heart, and we’re grateful that we have an industry that can support such personal, powerful film-making.”
Cérémonie de Clôture/Awards Ceremony #Cannes2016 pic.twitter.com/hR4oVArRb1
— Festival de Cannes (@Festival_Cannes) May 22, 2016
Labour’s shadow business secretary Angela Eagle was among those who congratulated Ken, tweeting: “Well done Ken Loach!”
Her party colleague Angela Rayner (Droylsden and Failsworth) added: “Absolutely made up for Ken Loach on his film I, Daniel Blake which has won the Palme D’Or at Cannes Film Festival.”
The film tells the story of the eponymous Daniel Blake, who, after having a heart attack, crosses paths with single mother of two Katie, who moves to Newcastle from London, 300 miles away.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article