John Swinney has strongly defended the Scottish Government's plans for new national school tests and insisted they will not add to the burden on teachers - as he faced vocal opposition to the proposal at a union's annual gathering.
The Deputy First Minister, newly in the role of Education Secretary, faced heckling from some delegates at the Educational Institute of Scotland's (EIS) annual general meeting in Dundee as he set out what he said was a need for the standardised assessments.
READ MORE: 'Schools could close' as Aberdeen's teacher shortage crisis deepens
He insisted the tests were "not about adding to the burden, creating league tables, or having a finger-pointing culture" but were for gathering data to find out how best to support young people.
And he told delegates the assessments would be short, age-appropriate and marked automatically - as he gave wider assurances on his "commitment" to cut teachers' workload.
His speech, on his 24th day in the education role, came the day after the EIS, Scotland's largest teaching union, backed a potential boycott of the testing plans.
They voted in favour of a motion resolving to ballot members in primary and secondary schools on a boycott of the administration and reporting of the test results if ministers impose an ''unacceptable'' system.
READ MORE: 'Schools could close' as Aberdeen's teacher shortage crisis deepens
The new assessments are being brought in for youngsters in P1, P4, P7 and S3 under the National Improvement Framework (NIF), with SNP ministers arguing the data is vital in helping them close the attainment gap in schools.
Mr Swinney told the meeting at the Caird Hall that his "driving mission" is to raise standards and close the gap.
To applause, he said: "If you find that it is difficult to close that attainment gap because of the degree of congestion within the curriculum then that is an issue that I commit to you today I will address as part of my tenure as Education Secretary."
He said the workload issue was a top priority and issued an invitation to members of the profession to set out to him what changes they believe would make a difference.
Mr Swinney said: "I will act on it because of one significant reason. I recognise - and this is what you can hold me to account for - that if we want to close the attainment gap in Scottish schools we have to liberate teachers to enable teachers to do that."
READ MORE: 'Schools could close' as Aberdeen's teacher shortage crisis deepens
He also told delegates: "We must have bold objectives in Scottish education, but we also must support those bold actions with practical steps."
But he faced dissent from within the hall when he turned to the new standardised assessments.
As the minister set out "why we need standardised assessments" he was met with loud cries of "we don't" from some delegates.
But he persisted: "We need them so that we can encourage and drive the process of educational attainment in Scotland because today we cannot judge effectively where to target interventions to support those that need that support to ensure they can fulfil their potential."
He gave assurances that assessments will be short and that "your professional judgment will be key".
And in a question-and-answer session, he told delegates: "I can hear that there's a lot to be discussed ... but we're not always going to agree on everything.
"The standardised assessments are not going to be additional to, they are going to be replacements of, because most authorities in some shape or form are doing some form of assessment process."
He said: "Standardised assessments for me are not about adding to the burden or about creating league tables or having a finger-pointing culture. They are about equipping us with the data to enable us to ensure that people are given the best chance in life to prosper."
That response was met with more shouts from the hall.
EIS general secretary Larry Flanagan said afterwards: "Clearly, as the Cabinet Secretary himself noted, we will not agree on every issue.
"Delegates in the hall made clear their very real concerns over the Scottish Government's plans for national standardised assessments within the National Improvement Framework, and Mr Swinney was left in no doubt that any return to a target-setting, league table approach to education would be fiercely resisted by teachers.
"However, his general comments on the need to tackle excessive workload and cut bureaucracy as a means to freeing up teacher time to support the raising attainment initiatives, were well received by teachers and lecturers within the hall."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article