THE BBC has been criticised for breaching a man's privacy by showing footage of a civil servant receiving medical treatment after falling on a Christmas night out.
An edition of Reporting Scotland showed images of the man being cared for in an ambulance by paramedics in a report on alcohol-related medical call-outs.
He had fallen in Glasgow city centre after an office Christmas party and the report, by BBC health correspondent Eleanor Bradford, also showed his wife arriving on the scene.
Read more: BBC Scotland cancels Scotland 2016 after losing late-night news show battle
Although the couple’s faces were obscured, they said they could be easily identified and complained to media watchdog Ofcom that they had not given consent for the footage to be shown.
The regulator has now ruled that the BBC breached the privacy of the man, named as Mr F in its judgement.
Ofcom said that the man was "filmed openly by the programme makers and he was informed that he was being filmed by the BBC".
But it added: “We noted the sensitive nature of the footage obtained and the fact Mr F was filmed whilst injured, not only in a public place ... but also as he received medical treatment in an ambulance.
Read more: BBC Scotland cancels Scotland 2016 after losing late-night news show battle
“We considered that, in these circumstances, in which he was receiving medical treatment, a particularly sensitive situation, he had a heightened legitimate expectation of privacy with regard to the obtaining of the footage and information relating to him."
The man was referred to in the report as a “civil servant in his 50s” but at one point his wife could be heard on camera saying his first name.
The watchdog said that in the unedited clip, the man had "repeatedly indicated that he did not want to be filmed or for the footage to be subsequently broadcast".
Read more: BBC Scotland cancels Scotland 2016 after losing late-night news show battle
It added: “Given this, it was clear to Ofcom that Mr F’s consent was neither sought, nor was it given by Mr F, during the filming of the incident.
“We also observed that, as set out above, much of the filming that took place was of Mr F receiving medical treatment in the ambulance, a particularly sensitive situation, and that despite his repeated indications that he did not want to be filmed, the crew continued to do so, which appeared to cause Mr F further agitation and confusion.
“In light of these circumstances, we considered that the means of obtaining the relevant material was not proportionate.
“Ofcom considered that, on balance, Mr and Mrs F’s legitimate expectation of privacy in relation to the filming of them outweighed the broadcaster’s right to freedom of expression and the public interest in obtaining the footage.
“Therefore, we found that Mr and Mrs F’s privacy in connection with the obtaining of the material included in the programme was unwarrantably infringed.”
The BBC argued that the report was in the public interest and that they had taken reasonable steps to protect the man’s identity.
The Reporting Scotland programme was broadcast on December 15 last year and was presented by Jackie Bird.
The report which featured the man focused on the impact alcohol-related call outs made over the weekend had on the Scottish Ambulance Service in Glasgow and the delays these call-outs caused to the service's response to “genuine emergency” incidents.
A BBC Scotland spokesman said: “We accept the ruling and believe, as does Ofcom, that there was genuine public interest in making the programme.
“The ruling states that ‘it was clear that the programme’s purpose was to show the burden placed on emergency services by avoidable alcohol-related call-outs’, though Ofcom felt that more could have been done to disguise the identities of those featured.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel