Scots are more likely to be pestered by nuisance and unsolicited calls than the rest of the UK, research suggests.
A survey by comparison website Which? shows that Scots are significantly worse off when it comes to calls about PPI and accident claims, as well as silent calls.
A total of 29 per cent of residents in Scotland said they had received 11 or more nuisance calls in the last month, compared to 17 per cent in the rest of the UK.
When it comes to unsolicited calls about energy deals, home improvement and energy efficiency, four in 10 Scots (38 per cent) say they have received such calls, compared to one in five (18 per cent) elsewhere.
A Scottish Government summit will be held in Edinburgh today to discuss the issue and look at ways to tackle nuisance calls.
Keith Brown MSP, cabinet secretary for economy, jobs and fair work, said: "Nuisance calls are simply unacceptable and the Scottish Government takes this issue extremely seriously. We will use our new consumer powers as a catalyst to protect Scots from the blight of these unwelcome calls.
"The summit is a key way to guide our work and brings together experts from regulators, consumer groups and industry who will work together to find practical ways of empowering and protecting consumers, as well as supporting businesses to be models of best practice.
"With some key powers also remaining reserved to Westminster, we will also be considering what more the UK Government could do, and how we best work with them to take concerted action."
The Which? research shows that, overall, eight in ten people in Scotland say they have received nuisance calls on their landline.
This is despite Scots being more likely than those in the rest of the UK to try to block unwanted callers, with 60 per cent of people who received a nuisance call asking to be removed from the database.
Scots are also more aware of the Telephone Preference Service, with more than half of those with a landline confirming they have registered.
The reason why Scotland receives more nuisance calls is unclear, but it is hoped that the summit will help to uncover why Scots in particular are being targeted.
Alex Neill, Which? director of campaigns and policy, said: "Millions of people are still being bombarded with nuisance calls and our latest research tells us that people in Scotland are being targeted far more than the rest of the UK.
"This summit is a major opportunity for businesses, regulators and the Scottish Government to make a difference by jointly committing to take action against this everyday menace."
Which?, whose Stop Nuisance Calls in Scotland campaign has attracted more than 25,000 signatures, is calling on the Scottish Government to take action by putting pressure on Scottish businesses to adopt voluntary changes and make senior executives personally accountable if companies breach the law.
They also want to see more help for vulnerable people to install call blocking technology.
Scottish and Southern Electric will attend the summit and were one of the first major companies to sign up to the Which? campaign.
Lee-Ann Fullerton, head of group media of SSE, said: "We hung up on cold calling in 2013 because customers told us they wanted to talk to us on their own terms, not be interrupted at all times of the day by companies they’d had no previous relationship with.
"SSE was the first major company to get behind Which?’s campaign to end nuisance calling and we’re delighted to be taking part in this Scottish summit to continue to tackle the issue and help empower and protect customers."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel