A BABY whose Hungarian immigrant parents did not want to care for her should be placed for adoption in England, a High Court judge has ruled.
Local authority social workers thought that the little girl, who is approaching her first birthday, should be sent to Hungary for adoption.
But her parents wanted her to be adopted in England because they thought that she would have a better life.
READ MORE: Surrogate mother wins legal fight to keep baby she carried for same sex couple
Mr Justice Baker has ruled in favour of the Hungarian couple after analysing the dispute at a private family court hearing in Bristol.
He said, in a ruling, that no-one involved could be named.
Mr Justice Baker said the couple had given up their baby for adoption at birth.
"The mother and father stated that they had come to England to better themselves, that they were not in a position to bring up the baby themselves, that they wanted the baby adopted in England," he said.
"(The mother) stressed ... that her principal reason for wanting her baby adopted in this country was because she believed that she would have a better life here."
Social services bosses said the little girl might suffer through being deprived of links with her extended family in Hungary - and her culture - if she was adopted in England.
READ MORE: Surrogate mother wins legal fight to keep baby she carried for same sex couple
But Mr Justice Baker doubted whether such a problem would cause the little girl "significant harm".
"I do not consider that the parents can be said to be acting unreasonably," said the judge.
"It is not unreasonable for them to want the baby to be placed for adoption in this country."
He added: "Unless society tolerates and facilitates such decisions, mothers who want their children to be placed in this country will be driven to take other steps."
And he went on: "In all the circumstances, I do not see how the mother's view that (the little girl) should be placed in this country could be described as unreasonable. It seems to me manifestly to fall within the broad band of choices which a reasonable parent might make."
Mr Justice Baker said the little girl would have to be made aware of her cultural heritage - and he warned that judges might make different decisions in other similar cases.
"It should not be assumed that this will be the outcome in every case where a child of foreign parents is relinquished for adoption. Each case will turn on its own facts," he said.
"In this case, it is plain that this is the outcome which best meets the welfare needs of this child.
READ MORE: Surrogate mother wins legal fight to keep baby she carried for same sex couple
"Those needs include being brought up with an understanding of her background and cultural heritage, and those who arrange her adoption should look carefully to ensure that any proposed adopters are aware of this factor and have the ability and commitment to bring her up with such an understanding."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article