UK Government health advisers have rejected calls for all children to be given the meningitis B jab.
The Joint Committee on Vaccination and Immunisation (JCVI) said extending the meningitis B programme to all children under two would put current stocks of the vaccine at risk.
It also ruled that older children should not receive the jab, saying this was not a "cost-effective" use of NHS cash.
The decision follows an announcement by the Government in March that it would not support the meningitis B vaccine being given to all children, saying it would be a waste of money.
The move will also apply to Scotland, where ministers are guided by the JCVI.
More than 820,000 people have signed a petition calling for the jab Bexsero to be given to all children.
The petition gathered momentum following the death of two-year-old Faye Burdett, from Maidstone, who died on Valentine's Day after fighting the infection for 11 days.
The Bexsero vaccine is available on the NHS for babies aged two months, followed by a second dose at four months and a booster at 12 months.
Parents who wish to have older children vaccinated must pay privately.
In its latest meeting, the JCVI considered a catch-up programme to capture all under-twos.
While it agreed this would be cost-effective, it said there was a risk to current stocks of Bexsero and noted a long lead time to procure new stock.
It said: "The committee noted there was unlikely to be any vaccine available to deliver any programme to those aged 12 to 23 months of age before the 2016/17 meningococcal season.
"The committee were also concerned about the serious risks to the infant programme that the use of Public Health England's buffer stock could present. Given these concerns, the committee agreed that they could not advise the Department of Health to consider such a catch-up programme."
Senior Medical Officer for the Scottish Government, Dr Nicola Steedman, said: “On vaccination issues the Scottish Government is guided by the independent, expert advice provided by the JCVI.
"We must ensure that continued sufficient vaccine within the routine childhood vaccination programme is available for infants under one year of age who are at greatest risk from Men B.
"Vaccinating the youngest infants most at risk also helps reduce the overall levels of circulation of the Men B organism, and protects others from the terrible disease it causes. The JCVI reviews the vaccination programme on a rolling basis, and should their advice change in the future we will move quickly to respond.”
Vinny Smith, chief executive of the Meningitis Research Foundation, said: "Vaccinating children under two years old against men B meningitis and septicaemia would have made a significant, life-saving difference to vulnerable members of our families, so we are extremely disappointed with the JCVI's conclusion.
"This is a significant opportunity missed to save young lives from this dreadful disease this winter.
"It is regrettable that vaccine supplies to protect these children cannot be secured in time for this year's meningitis season without jeopardising men B vaccinations for younger children who run an even greater risk, despite the renewed availability of vaccine for the private market."
Meningitis Now chief executive Liz Brown added: "We are hugely dismayed by today's decision, but will continue to campaign passionately for all children under the age of five to receive this lifesaving vaccine.
"We stand for the many thousands of families who are unable to protect their children from this devastating disease because they cannot afford to buy the vaccine privately. We will continue to fight against a system that discriminates against the health of the nation's children on an ability to pay basis."
ends
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel