The Ministry of Defence has denied that a shortage of money is behind delays in the construction of eight new Type 26 frigates for the Royal Navy.
Former first sea lord Admiral Lord West last month told the House of Commons Defence Committee that cutting steel on the new ships on the Clyde had been put back from 2016 because "there's almost no money available this year, and we are really strapped next year".
But the MoD's chief executive for equipment Tony Douglas told the committee on Wednesday that no start date had yet been set because design of the warships was only 60% complete.
And defence minister Harriett Baldwin denied that suppliers involved in the £8 billion programme had been told to "mothball" their contributions for up to three years.
Defence committee chairman Julian Lewis warned that delays in getting the state-of-the-art warships into service could end up costing money, as the operating life of the Type 23 craft they are replacing may have to be extended.
"It's hardly best value for money to penny-pinch now and then end up spending something like 50-60% more on the project later, as happened with the aircraft carriers," said Dr Lewis.
Industry insiders and experts had told the committee that there was a shortfall of around £750 million in the sums needed to press ahead with construction, he said, adding: "We believe that if the money was there, this programme could start very soon."
But Mr Douglas said that cash was not the issue, as the MoD was still negotiating with BAE Systems over the final design of the ship's communications systems and computer networks.
Some £1.8 billion had already been committed to long lead-time elements of the project, he said.
"If you were building an extension on the back of your house, you wouldn't get it priced if it was only 60% designed," he said.
"We are in a good place right now, but with 60% design fixity, this is about driving it to closure, which is the road we are on."
Mr Douglas declined to say when the Government would be in a position to name a start date for construction, but said it should come in "the relative short term".
Asked whether the National Ship Building Strategy would have to be published in the autumn without clarity on when or if the Type 26s would be built, he replied: "I don't believe that risk will play out by the autumn statement."
First Sea Lord Admiral Sir Philip Jones told the committee he was "entirely comfortable" with progress on the Type 26.
He pointed out that in the past the Navy had rushed through the design of communications and computer systems and "paid the price in operational terms", as the technology was developing so quickly.
"What we are working on now is the maturity of the design, the readiness of the industrial partner to be able to build it in the way we want to build it, the way it will be sequenced with other types of ship under the National Ship Building Strategy," he told the committee.
"It is not that we are not ready to build it, it is not that we don't have the money to build it, or that we haven't already committed substantial amounts of money for long lead items.
"We are just optimising with the industrial partner the right way to go into contract. I am comfortable with that."
Dr Lewis warned: "If it turns out costing a lot more because we didn't start it as early as we could have done with a bit more cash at this stage, you will understand that the public won't be satisfied."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel