David Cameron's disgraced former spin doctor Andy Coulson said his ex-boss lost the Brexit referendum because Westminster treated many voters like fools.
Mr Coulson, who was jailed for 18 months for conspiring to intercept communications, insisted that the ex-PM failed to do enough to deal with the growing anti-Europe, and anti-politics feeling in the country.
Presenting a report for Channel 4 News from his home county of Essex on why the Leave side won, Mr Coulson said: "I think that Westminster talked about self-empowerment, talked about control, but didn't deliver it. In short they kind of took the people of Essex for fools.
"So, it was no surprise that when they then empowered Essex man and woman with a vote on the referendum, they gave their view - very clearly and with bells on."
Mr Cameron's ex-spin chief said the former PM had been cautious on dealing with immigration for fear of being branded "rabidly right-wing".
"When the history of David Cameron's downfall is written, it is likely to be blamed on his decision to call a referendum. But, in truth, the miscalculation that mattered came long before.
"He was anxious about addressing immigration because he believed, quite correctly, that if he did so, he would be portrayed as being rabidly right wing. But to try and move the debate on to calmer territory was just impossible.
"As a result he couldn't do enough, quickly enough, to address the anti-Europe, but also the anti-establishment, the anti-politics, mood that was developing in places like Essex.
"He got it right on MPs expenses, but on these complicated issues of control, and on immigration itself, he was cautious.
"He wasn't alone, of course, the majority of senior politicians from the three main parties were looking in entirely the wrong direction. By the time the referendum campaign started, and Leave upped the anti on immigration, it was just too late," Mr Coulson said.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel