TOMMY Sheridan could receive around double his original £200,000 damages award against the News of the World because of a decade of interest charges, it has emerged.
Sheridan’s lawyer, Gordon Dangerfield, told the Sunday Herald he expected the standard "judicial rate of interest" of 8 per cent per year to apply to the damages, making the final award close to £400,000.
The former Scottish Socialist and Solidarity leader scored a critical victory over the defunct newspaper last week, when three judges refused to strike down his defamation win of 2006.
A jury awarded Sheridan £200,000 after he sued the paper for claiming he was a swinger and an adulterer while a Glasgow MSP.
Read more: Tommy Sheridan's £200,000 defamation victory over News of the World stands, says court
However in 2010, Sheridan was jailed for committing perjury during the defamation action.
The News of the World’s publishers, Rupert Murdoch's News International, had asked the Court of Session to strike down the 2006 verdict in order to end Sheridan’s claim on the £200,000.
However the Court refused, saying the jury could have fairly decided that Sheridan was defamed even if they did not believe he was squeaky clean.
“The verdict of the jury did not necessarily award the pursuer a badge of total credibility, total reliability, or total fidelity,” said the judgment.
The judges also said they felt they “should not ignore” material suggesting the News of the World spent £10,000 sending a key witness, Fiona McGuire, to Dubai during the 2006 action.
A memo from the paper’s editor, quoted in the court judgment, described McGuire, who was the source of the first Sheridan adultery story, as their “most flaky witness”.
Read more: Sheridan steps aside as Solidarity leader after struggling party wins 0.6% of Holyrood vote
The memo also said her past included “prostitution and drugs” and she needed “babysitting” by a reporter.
In 2011, McGuire told police her evidence against Sheridan in 2006 had been "untrue”.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel