European Union migrants will need to secure a job before they are allowed to move to Britain under proposals reportedly being considered by Theresa May.
The Prime Minister ruled out the points-based immigration policy championed by Brexit campaigners, saying on Monday it was ''not a silver bullet'' to reduce the numbers coming to the UK.
Instead, the premier is said to be looking at a system that will stop migrants heading to British shores to search for work.
Read more: May accused of backsliding on immigration after rejecting points-based system to curb numbers
Mrs May was accused of backsliding on immigration by outgoing Ukip leader Nigel Farage after she dismissed proposals for an Australian-style system that was backed by Foreign Secretary Boris Johnson, Brexit Secretary David Davis and International Trade Secretary Liam Fox in the EU referendum campaign.
During a visit to China, Mrs May said: ''A lot of people talk about the points-based system as always being the answer in immigration. There is no single silver bullet that is the answer in terms of dealing with immigration."
The PM said voters wanted "control" over Britain's borders and insisted there were ''various ways'' the Government could make that happen.
Mrs May is heading straight to a meeting of the Cabinet after landing back in the country following the brief trip to China for the G20 meeting of world leaders, where she sought to win support for the UK as it prepares for life outside the EU.
Mr Davis updated MPs on the progress made since the shock referendum result in June but faced claims the Government is "making it up as it goes along".
The Brexit Secretary told MPs it was "very improbable" that Britain would remain a member of the single market if it faced making concessions on border controls.
Read more: May accused of backsliding on immigration after rejecting points-based system to curb numbers
"This Government is looking at every option," he replied when asked about the UK's future in the trading bloc.
"The simple truth is, if a requirement of membership is giving up control of our borders, I think that makes it very improbable."
Mr Davis insisted there will be no attempt to "delay, frustrate or thwart" the will of the British people for the country to leave the EU.
"Naturally, people want to know what Brexit will mean," he told MPs. "Simply, it means leaving the European Union. So we will decide on our borders, our laws and the taxpayers' money.
"It means getting the best deal for Britain - one that's unique to Britain and not an off-the-shelf solution.
"This must mean controls on the numbers of people who come to Britain from Europe, but also a positive outcome for those who wish to trade in goods and services."
Mr Davis said the UK will "take the time needed to get it right" when it comes to negotiating with the EU, adding: "We will strive to build a national consensus around our approach."
He said the UK will also seek to "act in good faith" towards EU countries and his Brexit department now has more than 180 staff in London plus "expertise" from more than 120 officials in Brussels.
But opponents accused him of "waffle" and "empty platitudes" following the Commons statement.
Read more: May accused of backsliding on immigration after rejecting points-based system to curb numbers
Scottish National Party Europe spokesman Stephen Gethins accused ministers of being "irresponsible" in failing to explain what Brexit will involve.
He told the BBC Radio 4 Today programme: "They've had a couple of months. All we're asking for is for them to give us an idea of what they're looking at - Are we going to be part of the single market? What's the status of EU nationals? What about universities who have research grants that they need to plan long-term? What about food and drink producers? - and we are getting nothing.
"They can't even tell us the very basics. They don't know. It's pretty irresponsible."
Mr Gethins added: "The UK is about to go through one of the greatest constitutional upheavals since the fall of the Berlin Wall and yet it was all done on a blank piece of paper."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel