The total cost of a resettlement programme for Syrian refugees could top £1.7 billion, spending watchdogs estimate.
It follows a public commitment to take in 20,000 people driven from the war-torn country by 2020 following a public outcry over the fate of those attempting the perilous journey across the Mediterranean.
As well as providing the first estimate of the potential bill for the scheme, the National Audit Office(NAO) But there are warnings that a shortage of housing and school places could pose a threat to the chances of meeting the pledge.
Costs associated with the initiative fall to different central government departments and councils taking part, and no official total has been given so far.
The sum is uncertain as it depends in large part on the characteristics of those entering the country, the extent to which refugees need medical treatment or welfare services and the extent to which they can gain employment and become self-sufficient, according to the NAO.
Based on department assumptions, it estimated that the cost to the end of 2019/20 could be up to £1.1 billion, and up to £1.73 billion over the lifetime of the project.
The estimated total sum, which includes potential costs for healthcare, education and welfare, equates to £17,340 per refugee per year on average for their first five years in the UK.
Scotland has welcomed more Syrian refugees than any other part of the UK under the government’s official resettlement scheme.
Nearly 5,000 houses or flats, and more than 10,000 childcare and school places will be needed for the initiative, according to the National Audit Office.
Its report said: "The future of the programme could be put at risk by local authorities' lack of suitable accommodation and school places."
As of June 2,659 refugees had been resettled in the UK through the programme - 13 per cent of the target, with those arriving dispersed across 118 local authority areas.
Enough "indicative" pledges have been secured from local authorities to meet the aim.
"It is essential that these pledges materialise into firm offers of support as more refugees will need to be resettled each quarter during the remainder of the programme than have been so far", the NAO said.
The report said the scheme expanded the original programme successfully to resettle 1,000 refugees by Christmas.
Amyas Morse, head of the NAO, said: "The programme team achieved a great deal in a short amount of time, resettling much larger numbers of refugees than previous programmes, due in large part to the dedication and goodwill of those involved.
"The characteristics of the refugees arriving in the UK will become clearer over time. With this new information, the programme team must adapt budgets so that no organisation taking part in the programme struggles to participate effectively due to cost pressures."
David Simmonds, of the Local Government Association, said: "We have previously said that we were confident in ensuring that there would be sufficient pledges to support the Government's aim to resettle 20,000 people by 2020 and the Home Office has now confirmed this to be true. The focus must now be on ensuring families are well supported."
A Government spokesman said it is on track to meet the 20,000 commitment.
He added: "We have secured all the local authority pledges required to meet this commitment and the hard work across Government involving the devolved administrations and local authorities will continue until we have turned all of these pledges into places and resettled 20,000 people.
"This is a humanitarian programme and the level of funding enables local authorities to provide vulnerable refugees with a safe environment and the chance to rebuild their lives.
"We ask local authorities to consider carefully whether they have the necessary infrastructure and support networks before a resettlement occurs and we will only resettle individuals to a particular area once we've ensured these arrangements, including school places and housing, are in place."
ends
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here