PADDY Ashdown has raised the prospect of Theresa May calling a spring general election if this proves to be the only way she can get her preferred Brexit deal past her Right wing.
The Liberal Democrat peer, at a briefing with journalists at the party conference in Brighton, said: “The probability curve rises quite sharply towards a May election. All the constellations come in line for Mrs May during the early spring.
“Sooner or later she has to declare her hand as to what does Brexit actually mean. If I judge her right she is a prime minister who has a deep personal conviction about what is right for Britain...She is likely to arrive at a[view] that we should make what sacrifices are necessary to remain a member of the single market. That is the most likely decision she will reach...Norway with bells on.”
He argued this was a “solid position,” which would reflect the country’s view as a whole, and would be made known around the turn of the year. He characterised the Norwegian option as the “best of the worst options” and that Mrs May might be able to finesse it with, say, the introduction of work permits.
However, thus far, the PM has kept her cards close to her chest, stressing only how voters wanted a restriction on the free movement of people principle.
Nonetheless, Lord Ashdown stressed that by advocating the Norwegian option Mrs May would spark a serious Tory revolt as the Right cried betrayal.
The former party leader explained how the PM would not be able to carry her party for this preferred option and she would be unlikely to command a Commons majority, so in those circumstances the “likely outcome” would be that she would go to the country on the Norwegian proposition, which would “put the Right wing to bed” and damage Labour without seeming politically opportunistic.
He said there were deeper divisions in Tory Party that were presently apparent but which would break through to the surface once Mrs May revealed her hand on Brexit.
The former Lib Dem leader said a general election in those circumstances would “in effect” become a second referendum. The victorious PM would then have “a bargaining position with the voice of the British people behind her, she has smashed Labour when they are weak without looking opportunistic, she has put her Right wing to bed; that seems quite a good position”.
He said the British people’s decision on June 23 to leave the EU must be obeyed but if the UK was going to be out, then it should be as close to the EU as possible. However, the peer explained that if some time in the future, there were a second referendum, then the Lib Dems would campaign to get Britain back in the Brussels bloc.
“I don’t think that’s likely, I don’t think that’s going to happen, I can’t see immediate circumstances it would but we don’t resile from the position we’ve have always held; that we want to be in the EU,” he added.
Meantime, Lord Ashdown also warned that withdrawal from the single market could see Sinn Fein trigger a border poll in Northern Ireland with Protestant backing.
The former party leader said he was more worried about how the shockwaves of Brexit could impact on Northern Ireland than on Scotland.
The peer, who grew up in Northern Ireland, said a united Ireland vote pushed by Sinn Fein could gain some Protestant business support but would be defeated and be very destabilising.
"If we get a single market continuation, wise heads ought to be able to come to a conclusion which keeps the border open. If we get less than that, we track back towards a fixed border.
"Sinn Fein could very easily use the provision in the Good Friday Agreement that allows them to have a referendum to call a referendum.
"There are quite a few serious Protestant middle class, especially in the business community, who would say, 'you know, my heart goes to London, but my business interest goes to Europe'.
"But my judgement is that Sinn Fein couldn't win a majority. There's a high likelihood they'd call one in those circumstances. And the problem is that the very fact of calling a referendum in Northern Ireland will hugely destabilise," he added.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel