Alton Towers operator Merlin is facing a very large fine over the Smiler rollercoaster crash which left two teenagers needing leg amputations and several other passengers seriously injured.
Merlin Attractions Operations Ltd had already been warned by a judge earlier this year to expect a fine for health and safety breaches which led to a carriage on the £18 million ride smashing into an empty car.
On Monday, several of those left trapped on the ride following the crash in June last year attended the start of what is scheduled to be a two-day sentencing hearing at Stafford Crown Court.
Read more: Car causes gas leak after crashing into block of flats in Glasgow
The Recorder of Stafford, Judge Michael Chambers QC, will hear evidence from the Health and Safety Executive's (HSE) investigation into the crash, and mitigation from Merlin, before passing sentence.
At the beginning of the hearing, Judge Chambers said: "One of the features is not just the impact on those injured, but on those close to them."
He added that he had read all the victim impact statements.
He said the wounds suffered, both physical and psychological, had "changed the lives of the some of those injured, in the most dramatic way".
Vicky Balch and Leah Washington, who each lost a leg in the crash, were in court for the hearing, along with Joe Pugh, Daniel Thorpe and Chandaben Chauhan, who were also seriously hurt.
Read more: Car causes gas leak after crashing into block of flats in Glasgow
A hearing in April this year was told that Merlin had carried out its own internal investigation following the incident, which established that a worker manually "overrode" the rollercoaster's governing computer system.
Indicating a guilty plea to breaching the Health and Safety at Work Act, Merlin's barrister told the previous hearing that the company accepted that additional measures could have been taken to guard against safety risks.
Lawyers for the Health and Safety Executive (HSE) have said the Smiler ride, which opened in 2013, never had "a proper settled system" for staff to follow when carriages stopped on the track.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article