A group of bankers and consultants took part in a £245 million loan scam which saw funds splashed on high-end prostitutes and luxury holidays, a court has heard.
Up until 2007 Lynden Scourfield, 54, was lead director of impaired assets for Halifax Bank of Scotland (HBOS) in the south of England and South Wales, which provided advice to corporate customers experiencing financial difficulties, jurors at Southwark Crown Court were told.
David Mills, a former banker-turned-venture capitalist, was engaged frequently by Scourfield, who is not on trial, as a "turnaround consultant" to help improve these customers' businesses.
During 2003-2007 a corrupt relationship between Scourfield and Mills, 59, developed which was "at the heart of this case", Judge Martin Beddoe told the jury.
Scourfield advanced huge sums to the businesses from HBOS, "well past the point when it would have been obvious to any honest banker that the bank debt could and would never be repaid", prosecutor Brian O'Neill said as he opened the case.
This enabled Mills and some of the others to charge high consultancy fees which they profited from, and in some cases run the businesses for their own gain, he alleged.
Mills and his wife Alison Mills, 51; Michael Bancroft, 73; Mark Dobson, 55; Jonathan Cohen, 57; and John Cartwright, 71, appeared in the dock at Southwark Crown Court on Monday.
The list of charges includes conspiracy to corrupt, fraudulent trading and conspiracy to conceal criminal property.
All wore dark suits, while Mrs Mills wore a black and white patterned dress.
Money and large rewards are alleged to have been given to Scourfield from Mills, which took the form of use of an American Express card, luxurious holidays and sex with high-class escorts, the court heard.
Watched by a packed public gallery, Mr O'Neill said: "The motivation was greed. The police investigation uncovered evidence of huge rewards provided by Mills to Scourfield to effect his corruption.
"This took the form of money transfers, cash, expensive gifts, use of an American Express card for personal spending, unauthorised and inappropriately lavish hospitality, luxurious foreign travel and sexual encounters with high-class escorts."
More than £28 million passed though the personal accounts of Mr and Mrs Mills or the accounts of various of Mills' corporate entities, Mr O'Neill said.
One company, Clode, was operating within its £2.9 million overdraft in 2002 when a meeting was held to discuss its financial position, the court heard.
But its total indebtedness to the bank in 2007 when Scourfield resigned was £20.558 million - with Mr O'Neill claiming it was "a cash cow - the bank within the bank".
Bancroft, who is charged with one count of conspiracy to corrupt, three counts of fraudulent trading and one count of conspiracy to conceal criminal property, is said to have received £1 million in direct, traceable payments from Mills' company and the high-risk companies being helped by HBOS.
He was Mills' "man on the ground", engaged as a consultant to some of the businesses, "overseeing their demise and enriching himself in the process," Mr O'Neill said.
He continued: "This included spending more than £100,000 on the credit cards on one of the financially distressed companies he was supposed to be turning around, much of which was clearly personal expenditure despite the company's financial difficulties."
The trial is expected to last up to six months.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article