An Aberdeenshire farmer has topped the list of UK recipients of European farming subsidies, which includes Queen, the Duke of Westminster, the Duke of Northumberland, the Earl of Moray and a Saudi Prince.
The two large estates owned by leading pro Brexit campaigner Sir James Dyson, under Beeswax Farming (Rainbow) Ltd, received almost £1.5m from Europe.
But that was only half the cheque for Frank Smart, who owns farms near Banchory in Aberdeenshire. He claimed almost £3m under the Common Agriculture Policy (CAP) last year. It is not the first time he has been awarded the most public support.
The Herald reported that Mr Smart was the biggest recipient in 2009 of the then Single Farm Payment scheme under CAP collecting £1,212,545.94. In 2013 he received £3.22m.
Mr Smart or his company Frank A Smart & Son Ltd, received CAP grants of £2,963,732.77 last year. He is one of a group described as "slipper farmers" . They buy farms, with their subsidy entitlement, which they keep while letting their out to tenant farmers who do not enjoy the same public support. But the owners do little or any actual farming, so can keep their slippers on instead.
It is not illegal, but has been heavily criticised not least by farmers and crofters who struggle to get by, even when their subsidies arrive in time.
Mr Smart has rarely if ever talked publicly of his approach to farming. The Herald has repeatedly tried to contact him without success down the years. But he did tell the BBC "I don't want to discuss any part of my business with the media, thank you."
Changes have been made and support for slipper farmers is being phased out. However until 2020 they will still earn significant amounts. By that time the UK could be leaving the EU.
Chief Executive of NFU Scotland, Scott Walker, said “That’s why we are talking to government now about future agriculture policy.” He said there should be no place in any post-Brexit subsidy system for slipper farmers:
“The doors are being firmly closed on them. But because this is the first year of new rules that are being phased in, it is going to take a bit of time. Talk of farmers getting millions of pounds of CAP support is a ‘million miles’ away from the reality of what the vast majority of Scottish farmers and crofters receive through CAP schemes.”
He said public subsidy should be to support food production. “It also ensures that Scottish farmland, equivalent to 2.1 million football pitches, is kept in good environmental condition for the public to enjoy.”
He said despite the CAP support, farm incomes had halved in the past four years
Highlands and Islands Green MSP John Finnie, said of the subsidy claims: “These are astonishing figures that just do not reflect the true picture of crofting and farming at the moment. Unfortunately it seems always to be the case that people seek to circumvent, the purpose of public funding. Sums of nearly £3m for one person are quite shocking.”
Greenpeace analysed the recipients of CAP subsidies in the UK for the first time.
Some 16 of the top 100 are owned or controlled by individuals or families who also feature on the 2016 Sunday Times Rich List. They received a total of £10.6 million last year in "single payment scheme" subsidies alone, and £13.4 million in total farm subsidies, Greenpeace said.
These included Sandringham Farms, the estate owned by the Queen, which received more than half a million pounds (£557,706.52). Meanwhile Grosvenor Farms Limited, which farms the Duke of Westminster's estate, received £437,433.96. The billionaire landowner died in August and left his fortune to his 25-year-old son.
Percy Farms, described by Greenpeace as the "in-hand farming operation" of the Duke of Northumberland, was given £475,030.70.
Prince Khalid Abdullah al Saud, who owns champion racehorse Frankel, has reportedly described his farming interest as a hobby. Juddmonte Farms, which he owns through an offshore holding company in Guernsey, received £406,826 in farm subsidies last year.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here