BOYS typically read less thoroughly than girls no matter what age they are, two of the biggest studies on reading have found.
The studies into the reading habits of children in the UK found young males take less time to process the words, skipping parts and also choosing books that are too easy for them.
Keith Topping, professor of educational and social research at the University of Dundee, is behind two large-scale academic research papers into the effects of literature.
Research showed high-achieving readers of both sexes are reading Jeff Kinney Titles include Diary of a Wimpy Kid most, followed b y second-most read David Walliams' titles including World’s Worst Children, and third JK Rowling's Harry Potter series.
It was also reported that during the first years of secondary school, children were reading difficult books with a high degree of success, such as the Harry Potter novels.
Mr Topping said: “The males were significantly worse on the outcome measures, didn’t gain as much in performance on reading tests and their average percentage correct in the tests was low.
He said the first study suggested boys of all ages tended to miss sections out of pages or skipped some completely when reading, a trait less pronounced in girls.
Mr Topping said of his second study: “But we looked at fiction and nonfiction reading and we found that, although it was true that boys tended to choose nonfiction more than girls, particularly at secondary level, they still didn’t read it better than girls.
"They were choosing nonfiction but they were not reading it as thoroughly and correctly as girls reading nonfiction.”
It was reported the data came from a tenth of the 8.4 million children in the UK.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here