NEWSPAPERS have warned the appointment of a new press regulator could force them into signing up to a state-backed system of regulation that could jeopardise the independence of journalism.
The Press Recognition Panel, set up under a Royal Charter after the Leveson Inquiry, gave its backing to Impress.
It is supported by former Formula One boss Max Mosley, who had a dispute with the News Of The World over articles about his private life.
But most national newspapers have instead signed up to the voluntary Independent Press Standards Organisation (Ipso).
Culture Secretary Karen Bradley is considering whether to activate new rules under Section 40 of the Crime and Courts Act 2013. This would mean any newspaper that refused to sign up to the new regulator could have to pay the legal fees of a complainant who sued them for libel, win or lose.
Impress’s appointment was one of two triggers required to implement the Section 40 costs sanctions.
Henry Faure Walker, chief executive officer of Newsquest Media Group, owner of The Herald, has written to Ms Bradley warning it would have “devastating consequences” for local and regional newspapers and “for the principle of press freedom in our democratic society”.
Mr Faure Walker, writing on behalf of the group – the second largest publisher of regional newspapers in the UK – and its editors, said it had “grave concern” that Ms Bradley could impose the costs sanction.
He added: “We have no doubt the consequences of doing so will be devastating for the local press and for the principle of press freedom in our democratic society.
“It is no secret the purpose of Section 40 is to force the press into a state- ordained system of compulsory regulation. It is designed to do this by taking away from publishers who do not sign up to that system their right in law to recover their costs in libel, privacy and other media cases in the courts.”
Bob Satchwell, executive director of the Society of Editors, said the decision was “irrelevant” to the reality of press regulation, adding that the vast majority of the press and significant publishers reject the Royal Charter system under which the PRP was set up.
Dr Evan Harris, of Hacked Off, which campaigns for an accountable press, said the Impress decision would give the UK its “first regulator to have proven its independence and effectiveness.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel