A GROUP representing more than 27,000 retail investors is to press ahead with its compensation claim against the Royal Bank of Scotland (RBS) despite reports the lender is looking to settle some outstanding cases.
The RBoS Shareholder Action Group said it will continue its £1.25 billion compensation claim on behalf of investors who lost money after subscribing to shares during the RBS rights issue in 2008.
The group claims former directors at the bank had misrepresented its under- lying strength at the time and failed to include “critical information” in its prospectus.
Read more: Royal Bank of Scotland reports £469m loss in third quarter
The Edinburgh-based lender, which is 73 per cent owned by the taxpayer, is said to have held discussions with a group of institutional investors in a bid to settle a number of cases against the bank, Sky News reported.
A spokesman at the RBoS Shareholder Action Group said: “We note reports in the media that other shareholder group[s] may be close to settling their claims against RBS. We wish those claimants well, but today’s reports make no difference to our action group’s litigation against the bank.”
Former RBS chief executive Fred Goodwin will be among the defendants when the trial is held at the High Court in London on March 6 next year.
Since the near-collapse of RBS in 2008, successive new bank leaders have made strenuous efforts to distance themselves from Goodwin.
They are understood to be uneasy about being co-defendants with disgraced former colleagues in the pooled litigation process now under way.
Read more: Royal Bank of Scotland reports £469m loss in third quarter
In May 2014, it was revealed Lloyds was suing RBS for £420 million as part of the wider “group litigation order” lawsuit, a move that led to disquiet at the Treasury, where staff were concerned at the prospect of a spat between the two taxpayer-owned banks.
However, Lloyds later withdrew its claim.
As well as retail investors, RBoS represents a number of UK local authority pension funds and financial institutions, including Bank of America Merrill Lynch, Abbey Life, Axa, Aberdeen Asset Management and Lloyd’s of London.
RBS declined to comment.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article