CALLS have been made to break up the Royal Bank of Scotland after it admitted £2.5 billion had been lost so far this year.
Liberal Democrat Treasury spokesman Susan Kramer said the publicly-owned bank, which announced losses of £469 million in the last three months, should be restructured.
Royal Bank of Scotland (RBS) said that while the economy appeared to be holding up there was “uncertainty” over the future as it revealed it had seen a fall in mortgage applications, but those had now stabilised.
The bank was also forced to admit that it would miss next year’s deadline to sell off its Williams & Glyn branch network after RBS was bailed out by the taxpayer to the tune of £46bn at the height of the financial crisis in 2008.
Ms Kramer said it was “time for the Government to face reality”. She added: “We cannot keep holding RBS on our books indefinitely in the hope of a magical turnaround in its fortunes.
“The Government must use its stake in RBS to restructure the bank and create a new regional and community banking sector.
“Doing so would provide real help to small local businesses and ensure
that taxpayers’ funding of the bank delivers lasting value to the real economy.”
As part of EU rules governing its bailout conditions, RBS was told to offload its Williams & Glyn branches by the end of 2017.
But the bank said that, despite “positive discussions” with potential buyers, it will miss that deadline.
In a statement, the bank added: “RBS is therefore in discussions with HM
Treasury, and expects further engagement with the European Commission, to agree a solution with regards to its state aid obligations.”
RBS made an operating profit of £1.3bn, up from £826m the previous year. But it was hit by a multitude of restructuring and litigation costs.
RBS chief executive Ross McEwan said: “We’ve said that 2015 and 2016 would be noisy as we work through legacy issues and transform this bank for customers. These results reflect that noise.
“Our core business results were good, with a £1.3 billion adjusted operating profit - our best quarter since 2014.
“The core business has now delivered on average over £1 billion in adjusted operating profit for the last seven quarters.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article