Labour has demanded a probe after official figures showed that a number of SNP MPs have claimed far higher travel expenses than the politicians they replaced at last year's general election.
Ten have claimed twice as much or more than the MP who previously held their seat.
Labour claimed that the figures, which include staff travel, showed that SNP MPs were "milking the system for all it is worth".
But the SNP hit back saying that they reflected the fact that their MPs were working harder than many ex-Labour MPs had.
The Independent Parliamentary Standards Authority (IPSA) said that Stirling MP Steven Paterson claimed £41,506 last year, far more than the £17,569 claimed by then Labour MP Anne McGuire in 2013/14, her last full year in the job.
Alex Salmond, now the MP for Gordon, claimed £48,470.66 in travel expenses last year, while his predecessor Malcolm Bruce, a Liberal Democrat, claimed £22,394 in 2013/14.
Mr Salmond said that his personal travel expenses had totalled just over £19,000 but that he had been advised by House of Commons officials not to travel alone on public transport for security reasons.
The advice was given to the former First Minister when he was re-elected as an MP last year, before brutal murder of Labour MP Jo Cox.
Mr Salmond said that in the wake of Ms Cox's murder Labour's comments about his travel expenses were "beneath contempt".
A Scottish Labour spokesperson said: “These figures show SNP MPs are milking the system for all it is worth and taking taxpayers for a ride."
The party called for Nicola Sturgeon to order an internal audit of her MPs' expenses.
An SNP spokesman: “While Scottish Labour MPs were all but nearly wiped out at the last General Election, SNP MPs have consistently worked harder than their predecessors with higher attendance rates in the House of Commons.
The expenses include staff travel costs as well as MP travel to ensure constituents are better-represented in Westminster, and the expenses of Scottish Labour's only MP are actually higher this year than last.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel