Tory MP Conor Burns has told how he was left so poor after coming second in the 2005 general election that he had to choose between paying his mortgage or council tax.
He hit back at accusations from the Labour benches that he is so privileged he does not know what it is like to not know where his next meal is coming from, revealing that he had to sign on for jobseeker's benefit after graduating in 1994.
The MP for Bournemouth West was visibly shaking as he branded the comments by Paula Sherriff (Dewsbury) "the worst type of class war stereotypical nonsense".
The row came during a debate on a private members' bill to reform the Government's controversial benefits sanctions process.
Ms Sherriff hit out at Mr Burns' defence of the Government and said: "He is doing his best to suggest he can empathise with people, but I wonder if you have ever experienced not knowing where you're next meal is coming from or whether you can feed or clothe your children?"
Visibly angry at the comments, Mr Burns hit back: "I have in fact been in those circumstances. When I was unemployed when I graduated in 1994 in the worst graduate recession since the Second World War, when I myself had to sign on.
"And I experienced it again after I tried to get elected to this House in 2005 and hadn't got the money I had to make the decision about whether you paid the mortgage or the council tax, on overdraft.
"So yes I have."
His voice rising with anger, he added: "And I have to say, don't ever sit there and suggest to people that they do not have the ability to empathise in this House of Commons simply because they sit on this side of the House.
"That is the worst type of class war stereotypical nonsense that really we frankly should have moved way beyond in this House a long time ago."
Mr Burns was the Conservative candidate for Eastleigh in 2005, but came second behind Lib Dem Chris Huhne.
He was elected to Bournemouth West in 2010.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel