Norway has defended the prison conditions under which mass murderer Anders Behring Breivik is being held.
State attorney Fredrik Sejersted presented his closing statement on Tuesday in an appeals trial against a lower court ruling that found Breivik's isolation in prison violated his human rights.
The "state is allowed to defend itself", Mr Sejersted said at the end of a day-long session where he sought to prove that Breivik was being treated in line with democratic principles.
"The Norwegian Constitutional state has responded in a way that is worthy of this state," he said, adding that he shook Breivik's hand on the first day of the trial because "that is what we do in Norwegian courts".
During the trial, the state sought to show that Breivik does have meaningful human contact on a daily basis, including a weekly meeting with a priest with whom he can have confidential conversations.
"There can be no doubt that Anders Behring Breivik is very much being treated humanely" and that restrictions to limit his interactions with other right-wing extremists were necessary, Mr Sejersted said.
The hearing was taking place at the high-security prison in southern Norway where Breivik, a right-wing extremist, is serving a 21-year sentence for killing 77 people in a 2011 bomb-and-shooting rampage.
Breivik, 37, told the court last week that his solitary confinement in prison has deeply damaged him and made him even more radical in his neo-Nazi beliefs.
The hearing by the Borgarting Court of Appeals is taking place in a makeshift courtroom in the gym at the prison in Skien, 135 kilometres (85 miles) south-west of the capital, Oslo.
It ends on Wednesday, with a ruling expected in February.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article