On Tuesday Theresa May was hailed by some as the next Margaret Thatcher.
The “new Iron lady” following her ‘deal or no deal’ threat to the European Union.
And so it was a surprise 24 hours later to hear the Prime Minister appear to sound horrified by her own policy.
That moment came during Prime Minister's Questions, her first appearance before MPs since that speech on Brexit.
Mrs May had dropped the green and black tartan suit in favour of sharp black trousers and a black and grey jacket.
And her body language suggested that she would take no nonsense from MPs.
After all, as she warned yesterday, noises off could get the UK a worse deal from Europe.
So she was not impressed when the SNP's Westminster leader Angus Robertson asked her if she believed that the forecasted average £2,000 income drop and loss of 80,000 jobs in Scotland was worth her Brexit plan, or as he put it, a "price worth paying for her “Little Britain” Brexit?"
The Prime Minister was prepared for this line of attack.
The SNP, she told MPs, in a tone that can only be described as appalled “is dedicated to taking Scotland out of the Single Market”.
She appeared to be horrified at the very idea.
Some MPs on her own benches started to scratch their heads. Wait, they appeared to be thinking, aren't we?
After a long pause, the Conservative leader added: "by taking it (Scotland) out of the United Kingdom".
Ah, Tory MPs nodded. That is the difference.
The Prime Minister's charge against the SNP appeared to be hypocrisy, though viewers at home could have been forgiven for getting confused in the heat of the moment.
And, of course, SNP MPs reacted furiously, pointing out that the party's position is for an independent Scotland to be a member of the EU and therefore a member of the EU's Single Market.
So there you have it.
In the Prime Minister's own words - 'clarity' around Brexit.
As long as she does not take any more pauses in the middle of her sentences.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel