A health board has been told to apologise for sending a patient with a suspected brain aneurysm home, telling her she had muscle pain, after which she collapsed and died.
The case was investigated by a public services watchdog which concluded NHS Tayside had failed to provide reasonable treatment.
A report by the Scottish Public Services Ombudsman (SPSO) said: "While we could not say that the woman's life would definitely have been saved if the relevant tests had been carried out, independent advice that we obtained said that it was probable that her condition was treatable."
The investigation was sparked after the woman's husband took his complaint to the SPSO following his wife's death.
Her GP referred her to Perth Royal Infirmary on January 7 last year with a suspected brain aneurysm after she reported sudden headache and neck pain.
After hospital assessment by a specialist trainee doctor and consultant physician, she was told the problem was likely muscular and discharged.
The woman, known only as Mrs C in the report, went back to her GP three times in the next 15 days before collapsing at home on January 24 with signs of acute bleeding on the brain.
Medical staff deemed further treatment inappropriate and the woman died two days later.
The SPSO sought an independent opinion on the woman's treatment from a consultant physician, who said she should have had a brain scan when she first attended hospital as well as a possible lumbar puncture to check for bleeding on the brain.
The watchdog found Mrs C's diagnosis of muscoskeletal neck pain "unreasonable" and asked the health board to apologise in writing to her husband for this and for failing to deal with his complaints in a "timely and professional manner".
NHS Tayside was also asked to provide evidence to ensure patients are monitored properly, that adults presenting with headaches are investigated in line with national guidelines and that discharge notes also comply with the same guidelines where required.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here