The Conservatives have launched a furious onslaught on Jeremy Corbyn, accusing him of "siding with Britain's enemies" amid signs Labour is gaining ground in the opinion polls.
The Labour leader came under fire following a television interview in which he faced repeated questions over whether he condemned the IRA.
Mr Corbyn - who attended rallies and protests organised by the Republican-backed Troops Out Movement in the 1980s - said he condemned "all bombing" but had been trying to open up a peace process.
His comments were angrily denounced by Security Minister Ben Wallace who said voters would be "outraged" by his refusal to "unequivocally" condemn the IRA.
However ministers also found themselves forced onto the defensive over Conservative plans to overhaul funding of social care which would for the first time see thousands of elderly people required to pay for the cost of being looked after in their own homes.
Mr Corbyn's comments came during an interview with Sky News's Sophy Ridge On Sunday programme in which he defended his contacts with Republicans in the midst of the IRA bombing campaign.
"In the 1980s Britain was looking for a military solution in Ireland. It clearly was never going to work. Ask anyone in the British Army at that time," he said.
"Therefore you have to seek a peace process. You condemn the violence of those that laid bombs that killed large numbers of innocent people and I do."
Pressed as to whether he would "condemn the IRA without equating it to ...?" Mr Corbyn replied: "No, I think what you have to say is all bombing has to be condemned and you have to bring about a peace process."
Mr Wallace, who served as an Army officer in Northern Ireland, said: "People up and down the country will rightly be outraged that Jeremy Corbyn won't unequivocally condemn the IRA for the bloodshed, bombs and brutal murders they inflicted on a generation of innocent people.
"Jeremy Corbyn has spent a lifetime siding with Britain's enemies, but he and his extreme views could be leading our country and representing it abroad - negotiating with 27 EU countries - in just over two weeks' time.
"We want a Prime Minister, not a leader of a protest movement who has opposed nearly every measure to keep this country safe in the last thirty years.
The row erupted as four opinion polls for the Sunday newspapers put Labour between 35% and 33%, up significantly on the scores as low as 26% it was recording early in the campaign.
The Tory advantage was narrowed to just nine points in one survey by YouGov for the Sunday Times - the first time it has been in single figures in a mainstream poll since Theresa May called the snap election on April 18 - prompting talk of a "wobble weekend" for the Conservatives.
Ministers said the findings would focus voters' minds on the prospect that Mr Corbyn could be leading the Brexit talks, due to start less than two weeks after election day, underlining the nature of the choice facing them at the ballot box.
Foreign Secretary Boris Johnson said Mr Corbyn "hasn't got a clue" whether he wants Britain to remain in the single market or the customs union and that EU negotiators would "have him for breakfast".
Mr Johnson told ITV's Peston on Sunday: "We are at a critical phase in the history of this country. We have to get Brexit right. I am genuinely alarmed by the idea that it could be handled in just 11 days after the election by Jeremy Corbyn."
The Foreign Secretary defended the Conservatives' plans to overhaul social care, saying that with the number of over 75s set to increase by two million over the next 10 years, they had to address the "huge costs" involved.
"I think it is a mark of Theresa May's bravery and candour with the electorate that she is doing this. It shows the strength and purpose she will bring to everything she does if we are re-elected," he said.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel