A senior Conservative has been urged to apologise after claiming that most foodbank users were not "languishing in poverty".
Former justice minister Dominic Raab came under fire when he claimed that many people receiving food parcels have "a cash flow problem episodically" as he sought to defend the Government's record during a TV debate.
Some 1.2 million food parcels were handed out last year, according to The Trussell Trust charity, while Prime Minister Theresa May faced pressure to tackle the issue when reports emerged that nurses had been forced to use foodbanks.
Asked why so many people were using foodbanks during an election debate hosted by BBC's Victoria Derbyshire, he said: "In terms of the foodbank issue, and I've studied the Trussell Trust data, what they tend to find is the typical user of food bank is not someone that is languishing in poverty, it is someone who has a cash flow problem episodically.
"No it's true. That is what the Trussell Trust papers say."
However, a spokesman for the charity told the Press Association that delays to benefit payments and low wages were the most common reasons for foodbank referrals.
Mr Raab was challenged by the SNP's John Nicolson on the programme, who said the charity would be "outraged" at his comments.
Liberal Democrat leader Tim Farron also weighed in on the row, describing Mr Raab as "woefully out of touch" and called on him to apologise.
He said: "We are seeing nurses, police officers and the just about managing having to go to food banks as their pay cheques won't stretch any further.
"These are stupid and deeply offensive comments by Dominic Raab and he should apologise."
A Trussell Trust spokesman said: "Trussell Trust data shows that the main reasons for a foodbank referral are delays and changes to benefit payments and low income issues that include people who are struggling with low pay or insecure forms of employment.
"It is our experience that people living in poverty are more likely to experience a sudden short-term crisis where they are referred for emergency food whilst the underlying causes are addressed."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel