EITHER you’re born crazy or you’re born boring”, reads a mantra on Oliver Stone’s website. The words accompany a photograph of this powerhouse film-maker, looking debonair in a black tie and dinner jacket. Regardless of what you think of Stone and his films and political views you could never say he is boring.
Nine months ago the LA Times introduced an interview with Stone about his films by observing that he had never shied away from such big subjects as war, political corruption, greed, criminality and hidden conspiracies and had long been “one of Hollywood’s most consistent lighting-rods for controversy”. The headline over the article dubbed him an “ageing provocateur”.
Stone, 70, returned to the headlines this week with the release of The Putin Interviews, an ambitious, four-part documentary consisting of interviews with the Russian President Vladimir Putin. Given the identity of the interviewee and interviewer, considerable attention was focused on the programme – which, in this country, aired on successive nights at 2am on Sky Atlantic.
The Washington Post, assessing the first two episodes, dismissed it thus: “What might have once promised to be an explosive on-screen matching-of-wits instead arrives just in time to be colossally irrelevant: an erstwhile scoop made instantly negligible by the breaking news it’s been engulfed by, and the imaginative and ideological limits of its director.”
Stone also underwent an uncomfortable interview on Stephen Colbert’s Late Show last Monday. The audience groaned and mocked him when he spoke of the Putin’s “calmness and courtesy” and that he “never really said anything bad about anybody and, I mean, he’s been … insulted and abused”. Colbert also quizzed him about an apparent failure to follow up Putin’s bland statement that he would never interfere in the domestic affairs of another country.
Writing in the Guardian on Tuesday, however, Mark Lawson pointed out that Stone pressed harder on tough questions for Putin in the later episodes, concluding: “Stone has done a great service to democracy. If the first two episodes are won, in boxing terms, by the interviewee, fair referees would call the third a draw and the fourth, if not a knockout, a victory for Stone in terms of undefended punches”.
Stone was born to a successful stockbroker and a French war bride. She was a young student with whom Stone’s father, then in the US Army, eloped in Paris in 1945. As a young man Stone dropped out of Yale and travelled widely before seeing US army service in Cambodia and Vietnam. He was twice wounded and received the Bronze Heart and Purple Star.
Early in his film career he wrote the screenplays for such hits as Midnight Express (directed by Alan Parker), Conan the Barbarian (John Milius), the gangster epic Scarface (Brian de Palma) and Year of the Dragon (Michael Cimino). He deservedly won the Best Adapted Screenplay Oscar for Midnight Express.
His Vietnam experiences formed the basis of his acclaimed war film Platoon, which took Best Director and Best Picture. Stone won a second Best Director Oscar for Born on the Fourth of July – the second part of his Vietnam trilogy – in which Tom Cruise excelled as a paralysed Vietnam vet-turned-antiwar-activist.
Stone's subsequent projects included Wall Street (in which Michael Douglas famously declared, “Greed, for lack of a better word, is good. Greed is right”), The Doors, with Val Kilmer channelling Jim Morrison and the Oscar-nominated conspiracy thriller JFK, which used the real-life footage shot by Abraham Zapruder of the assassination of President Kennedy in Dallas, but which critics said had toyed with the historical record. Any Given Sunday, about a professional American football team, the Miami Sharks, featured a stirring pre-game motivational speech by coach Al Pacino.
Later, there were films about Presidents Richard Nixon and George W Bush. World Trade Center (with a haunting score by Glasgow-born composer Craig Armstrong) depicted two New York Port Authority policemen, who were on duty and trapped in the rubble of the Twin Towers. Stone’s most recent films have been the drugs-cartel thriller, Savages, and Snowden, about the NSA whistleblower Philip Snowden.
Stone, however, has also made several politically-aware documentaries, including three on Fidel Castro, one on the social and political transformations across South America and a “Verité documentary” in 2003 in which he allowed leaders of Israel and the Palestinian Authority “to speak their minds, ultimately demonstrating just how far apart the two sides stand”. This approach of allowing politicians to speak their minds at length seems to have been repeated in the Putin documentary.
Stone also shot the series The Untold History of the United States, “a new look at the birth of the American empire”. He and Professor Peter Kuznick co-authored an accompanying book which set out, in 700-plus pages, to probe “the dark corners of the administrations of 17 presidents, from Woodrow Wilson to Barack Obama” and ask “just how far the US has drifted from its founding democratic ideals”. The New York Times said the TV series was sure to draw ire from both left and right and that it would put Stone in the role “he loves best: provocateur”.
Speaking to the LA Times last September Stone said he was not one of those people who doesn’t reflect. “My life in movies is the growth of my consciousness” he said. “Every year was an expansion in some way.” He looked back at the circumstances surrounding – and the reaction to – some of his best-known films.
“I never thought I’d make it to 70,” he acknowledged candidly. “We’ll see where we go from here.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here