Carrie Fisher had heroin, cocaine and MDMA in her system when she died but their role in her death could not be determined, a coroner has found.
The full report released on Monday records her death as “undetermined” after concluding the cocaine could have been taken up to three days before she was taken ill on a flight from London to Los Angeles.
The actress, who rose to fame as Princess Leia in Star Wars, then died aged 60 in hospital four days later on December 27.
The Los Angeles acting chief coroner Dr Christopher Rogers recorded her cause of death as sleep apnoea, where breathing cuts out during slumber, and various other “undetermined factors”.
He also listed arherosclerotic heart disease as a factor as well as “multiple drug use” but said its significance could not be determined.
Carrie Fisher (Ian West/PA)
Urine tests on her hospital admission came back positive for cocaine, methadone, alcohol and various opiates.
“At this time, the significance of cocaine cannot be established in this case,” toxicologist Cyrus Rangan wrote.
Heroin, morphine and methadone were also detected but when they were taken could not be calculated.
The toxicologist noted those opiate drugs can all suppress breathing.
The expert added: “The available information is insufficient to establish the significance of opiates and opioids in this case regarding cause of death.”
Coroner investigator Nani Cholakians also detailed what happened in the flight back from the UK where she had been filming on British sitcom Catastrophe.
She wrote: “Her personal assistant reported that the decedent (Fisher) was last awake and normal at the beginning of the flight.
Carrie Fisher (Ian West/PA)
“Throughout the flight she had multiple apneoic episodes, which was her baseline, and near the end of a 10-hour flight she was not to be aroused.
“A few minutes later the decedent vomited profusely then slumped over.”
After an initial news release on Friday, Fisher’s daughter Billie Lourd said she “ultimately” died of drug addiction and mental illness.
Fisher had long battled conditions such as bipolar and had become a prominent voice for those with the disorder.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here