The US Supreme Court has allowed the Trump administration to go forward with a limited version of its ban on travel from six mostly Muslim countries.
The decision is a victory for President Donald Trump in the biggest legal controversy of his presidency so far.
The justices will hear full arguments in October in the case, which has stirred heated emotions across the nation.
Very grateful for the 9-O decision from the U. S. Supreme Court. We must keep America SAFE!
— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) June 26, 2017
In the meantime, the court said that Mr Trump’s ban on visitors from Iran, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, Syria and Yemen can be enforced if those visitors lack a “credible claim of a bona fide relationship with a person or entity in the United States”.
Mr Trump said last week that the ban would take effect 72 hours after being cleared by the courts.
The administration has said the 90-day ban was needed on national security grounds to allow an internal review of screening procedures for visa applicants from the six countries.
The travel ban was a key campaign pledge for Mr Trump (Charlie Neibergall/AP)
Opponents say the ban is unlawful, based on visitors’ Muslim religion.
The administration review should be complete before October 2, the first day the justices could hear arguments in their new term.
A 120-day ban on refugees is also being allowed to take effect on a limited basis.
The US Supreme Court is allowing a limited version of the ban come into force (David Ake/AP)
Three of the court’s conservative justices said they would have let the complete bans take effect.
Justice Clarence Thomas, joined by Samuel Alito and Neil Gorsuch, said the government has shown it is likely to succeed on the merits of the case, and that it will suffer irreparable harm with any interference.
Justice Thomas said the government’s interest in preserving national security outweighs any hardship to people denied entry into the country.
A 120-day ban on refugees is also being allowed to take effect on a limited basis (Evan Vucci/AP)
Some immigration lawyers said the limited nature of the ban and the silence of the court’s liberals on the issue on Monday suggested that the court had not handed Mr Trump much of a victory.
They said relatively few people would fall under the ban because people coming to study, work or visit family members in the United States already have sufficient relationships with others already in the country.
One judge said the government’s interest in preserving national security outweighs any hardship to people denied entry into the country (Evan Vucci/AP)
Mr Trump, though, hailed the high court’s order as a “clear victory for our national security”.
He said in a statement that his “number one responsibility” is to keep the American people safe.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here