YOU do not have to a right-wing Tory to accept that the deficit in 2010 was spiralling out of control.
Bank bailouts had plunged the country into the red and the Conservative-LibDem coalition had little choice but to put the brakes on public spending.
Given that public sector salaries make up a huge proportion of overall spending, it was also inevitable that some element of wage restraint would be an important part of getting the deficit down.
However, what the public got wasn't the kind of financial sense our grandparents operated by, but an austerity agenda of cruelty to the poor and bail-outs to the rich. Hundreds of thousands of public sector staff are sick of wages failing to keep up with the cost of living.
Deficit reduction became a hindrance to a decent life and an ideological obsession.
Wage restraint is particularly galling when loopholes exist which allow the highest-paid public sector staff to bust the pay cap - as such, bonus schemes cause resentment amongst low paid employees.
In the Ministry of Defence, a graded bonus scheme is being proposed that disproportionately benefits high earners.
If a “senior professional” is judged to have performed exceptionally, he or she will get a bonus worth 20% of salary. That's a far cry from the 1% pay cap facing nurses, teachers, police and firefighters.
The Government, which is never shy of telling voters money is tight, should dispense with bonuses and use the cash to fund a more generous pay rise for all its staff.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here