LIAM Fox has attacked the BBC and other media outlets for wanting to see "Britain fail than see Brexit succeed".
The international trade secretary’s comments came as David Cameron threatened to deepen the Tory rift on Brexit by reportedly suggesting Britain should seek partial membership of the single market known as the “Norway option”.
Dr Fox unleashed his attack on the BBC during Commons exchanges when concerns were raised about how negative media coverage was undermining his efforts to make trade deals with countries outside the EU.
His Tory colleague Nigel Evans, the former deputy Speaker, said during trade questions: “The potential for trade with Commonwealth countries is very exciting, growing economies, strong economies but every time I open a newspaper or listen to the radio or TV, the story is done very negatively, almost as if it's going to be impossible for us to do these trade deals.
"Do you feel that is both wrong and undermines the work that you are doing?"
The secretary of state replied: "It does appear that some elements of our media would rather see Britain fail than see Brexit succeed.
"I cannot recall a single time in recent times when I have seen good economic news that the BBC didn't describe as 'despite Brexit'."
His comments came after Andrea Leadsom, the Commons leader, who was a prominent Leave campaigner, called for broadcasters to be "a bit patriotic" during an interview with BBC Newsnight last month.
Asked about Dr Fox’s attack on the BBC, Theresa May’s spokesman said: “Ministers and MPs will always have their views. It’s a matter for newspapers, broadcasters and others to determine the tone and content of their coverage.”
Asked if it was unpatriotic to be critical of the Brexit process, he replied: “I have just answered the question.”
However, Dr Fox came under fire from his political opponents.
Labour veteran Barry Sheerman said it was a "silly attack" on the BBC and called for the minister to resign amid claims he had lost the confidence of manufacturers for "living in cloud cuckoo land" over Britain's future.
For the Liberal Democrats, Alistair Carmichael, described Dr Fox’s attack on the media as “dangerous” and a “misplaced intervention”.
He urged his fellow Scot to get on with the work of Government rather than trying to deflect from the failings of his own department.
“It is extraordinary,” declared the former Scottish secretary, “that Mr Fox feels it is appropriate to attack the media. He looks like Donald Trump without the perma-tan. He may of course be trying to distract us from the official data today that shows the number of jobs created by foreign investment fell by nine per cent last year."
Dr Fox also took a swipe at others when responding to a question about global trade deals.
He said: "It's not just about exports, it's also about inward investment.”
He went on: "I can bring the House up to date that at 9.30 this morning we published figures that showed a record-breaking number of foreign direct investment projects came in to the UK in 2016/17, at 2,265, and that's safeguarding nearly 108,000 jobs or creating new jobs in the UK.
"No doubt the usual suspects will describe it as 'despite Brexit'."
Meanwhile, Tory sources suggested Mr Cameron was privately pressing MPs to support a soft Brexit with Britain rejoining the European Free Trade Association.
This would mean that the country could become a partial member of the single market along the lines of Norway or Switzerland.
It was suggested the former PM had been telephoning a number of Conservative MPs, promoting the idea.
However, such a proposal is likely only to widen the rift within Tory ranks as Leavers will insist this would mean Britain still being tied to the EU through the single market over which it would have no control and would have to pay an annual fee for membership.
Asked about Mr Cameron’s reported view, the PM’s spokesman said he had not seen any direct comments from the former Tory leader. “We have set out our plan in Lancaster House and in the Brexit paper and that remains our plan,” he added.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel