HEALTH boards paid their top doctors more than £43m in bonuses last year, despite a Scottish Government effort to clamp down on the practice.
Figures obtained by the Scottish Tories under freedom of information showed the 14 regional boards paid almost 3000 staff an average of £15,000 in merit bonuses in 2016/17.
The money was paid to senior medics in the form of “distinction awards” and “discretionary points”, on top of salaries of up to £105,000.
The bonuses go to consultants and other senior staff who perform above expectation, but there have been concerns the payments have become routine.
The latest figures suggest pay-outs rose almost £6m last year, although the true figure may be lower as there was a gap in the data relating to NHS Grampian.
In total, just over £43m was paid to 2,858 recipients in the last 12 months.
Discretionary awards for the best performing consultants can be highly lucrative.
Those given the A+ rating earn an extra £75,889 a year, those rated A get £55,924 and those rated B enjoy a salary uplift of £31,959.
The SNP Government froze the payments levels in 2010 amid criticism of the system.
In 2015, just under six per cent of all consultants received a distinction award, with just 26, or one in 200, getting an A+ award, 68 an A and 227 a B.
The rise in overall bonus payments was driven by a hike in the wider system of locally-set discretionary points, which can be worth up to £25,632 extra in pensionable salary.
The biggest bonus payouts last year were in NHS Greater Glasgow & Clyde, which added £12.6m to salaries, and where discretionary point recipients rose from 878 to 907.
In NHS Lothian, the number of discretionary point recipients rose from 470 to 500, adding £485,000 to a total bonus bill of £7.3m.
The bonus bill in cash-strapped NHS Tayside was £5m, for NHS Grampian £4.7m and for NHS Lanarkshire £3.3m.
Scottish Conservative health spokesman Miles Briggs said: “There’s nothing wrong with hard-working medical professionals being incentivised and rewarded for their work.
“And of course there’s an acceptance that the NHS has to pay competitively if it wants the best staff.
“But senior medics like consultants are already very well remunerated, and many - including NHS workers further down the chain - will question the sheer scale of these payments.
“The NHS is extremely hard up, and these are payments worth tens of millions of pounds.
“It’s another example of the SNP government saying it’s going to do something, then forgetting about it more or less immediately.
“Scotland’s NHS deserves a government at Holyrood which pays more attention.”
Simon Barker, chair of BMA Scotland's Consultants Committee, said NHS Scotland faced global competition to attract and retain the best staff.
He said: “These long-standing elements of the defined pay structure for consultants are intended to recognise those who contribute most in the delivery of safe, high-quality care to patients and to leading continuous improvement of NHS services.
“The NHS in Scotland faces competition in a global market when it comes to attracting doctors to work here and we are steadily losing ground. In the face of a 15 per cent real terms pay cut over the last five years there are now over 400 unfilled consultant posts in Scotland, with half of these jobs lying empty for over six months.
“Every vacant position increases the strain on the rest of the health service and makes it more difficult to cope with the rapidly increasing demands the NHS faces.
“We can only deliver high standards of healthcare if we are prepared to recognise and reward the investment of at least a decade that goes into training to be the skilled and specialist consultants that the people of Scotland deserve when they need them.”
Health Secretary Shona Robison added: “This Government values the enormous contribution NHS Scotland staff makes to the health service. Over 98 per cent of NHS employees earning in excess of £100,000 are clinicians or consultants.
“It is right that we pay the going rate, which is reviewed annually by the independent pay review bodies, in order to attract and retain highly-skilled and much sought-after staff.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel