Vladimir Putin's envoy in Scotland has mocked Britain's nuclear deterrent and the Royal Navy as not being worth spying on.
In a letter to The Herald, Russian consul-general Andrey Pritsepov dismissed reports that his country's submarines were "lurking" near Faslane to keep tabs on Trident missile-carriers.
However, the diplomat did so by suggesting Russians would not vote for a leader who commended his navy to chase "someone's sold and lonely operative u-boat which is firing missiles in the opposite direction".
Mr Pritsepov's dig echoes reports in Kremlin-controlled Russian-language media earlier this year which said the "waves now ruled Britannia". Moscow experts - citing reports that the Royal Navy was having difficulty deploying its ageing Trident submarines - have said the UK is "naked under the sea". The diplomat also appears to be referencing the misfiring of a missile by the submarines in recent tests.
Mr Pritsepov also suggested the Russian navy would have no need to follow "Type 45 destroyers with faulty engines or an aircraft carrier without aircrafts on it, all of them being located in Scottish waters".
The Russian criticised the Herald for, like other UK media, publishing claims Russian subs were close to Faslane. UK and Russian underwater vessels are understood to play cat and mouse regularly. Mr Pritsepov said such accounts should be taken with a pinch of salt.
A Trident missile launch
His mocking on the Royal Navy echoes concerns in the British military about the readiness of the British fleet, which has shrunk in recent years and which has little surface presence in Scottish waters. However, Russia's own navy, always seen as its cinderella service, has its own problems. This month it emerged plans for a £9bn nuclear-powered super-carrier to carry scores of fighters had been put on hold. This ship was to replace its sole ageing aircraft carrier, the Admiral Kuznetsov, which has steamed past Scotland several times in recent years, often belching black smoke.
The Admiral Kuznetsov Aircraft Carrier
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel