POLICE officers and firefighters see benefits to their new national services but are still worried about cuts as wider austerity hits.
They gave their views as part of the latest health-check on reforms introduced in 2013 to offset falling funding and end a postcode lottery on specialist units.
The evaluation was undertaken by the Scottish Institute for Policing Research (SIPR), ScotCen Social Research and What Works Scotland for the government.
Their report stated: “From the perspective of local police officers and firefighters. there were positive achievements in relation to improvements in accessing national capacity and specialist expertise.
“There were also strong commitments to partnership working.
“But the perceptions of those involved in the routine delivery of local services was that they are operating with diminishing resources, that work to strengthen connections with communities was often hampered by other organisational pressures, and the reductions in the budgets of other public services sometimes frustrated attempts to work more collaboratively.”
Among police officers, the report uncovered concerns over the visible presence of local officers in communities and “a perception that local resources... are increasingly stretched over larger geographical areas” as a result of redeployment of some officers to specialist roles and a reduction in civilian staff.
In the fire service, the report found evidence of a perception that the level of local service had been maintained since reform.
However it noted firefighters had reported feeling stretched as a result of a drop in admin staff and had concerns regarding the centralisation of support services, poor IT and their ability to access some equipment.
Evidence of low morale among front line staff in both services was also noted, with firefighters in some areas starting to leave after only a few years in the job, citing issues such as increased stress.
The report echoed much public debate on the issues over recent years, which has already led to a greater focus on local work in both services.
Outgoing Deputy Chief Constable Iain Livingstone said: “Police Scotland has continued to evolve and, as the report recognises, has already begun to address the issues raised in this report through the long-term strategy, Policing 2026.
A spokeswoman for the police oversight body, the Scottish Police Authority, said: “While the report looks back at earlier experiences of reform, it identifies learning points that remain relevant and valid today and which have been acknowledged, and are being addressed, by the SPA and Police Scotland.
“We are alive to the need to address any perception that local, front line policing has diminished.”
Diane Vincent, of the Scottish Fire and Rescue Service (SFRS), said: “We are now looking at how the SFRS needs to develop to meet the new and emerging risks facing Scotland and we will work with our people to ensure they have a voice and help to directly shape a shared vision for a service of the future.”
Justice Secretary Michael Matheson said while both services are already taking action on many of the areas of improvement, “I know they will reflect further to ensure they remain well-placed to keep Scotland safe from crime, accidents and other risks of harm”.
Scottish Conservative justice spokesman Liam Kerr - whose party was the first to suggest the reforms - said: “This is a damning report, exposing the great many problems that exist within the SNP’s single police force.
“It shows clearly that the Scottish Government is expecting officers to operate with fewer resources, and creating a context in which they are not being given sufficient time to properly engage with the public.”
Scottish Labour’s justice spokeswoman Claire Baker said: “Under the SNP’s watch, our emergency services have seen crisis follow crisis as a result of budget cuts and poor leadership.
“We need to see the Justice Secretary take responsibility and ensure our emergency forces have the resources and support they need to keep our communities safe.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here