A FISH and chip restaurant, a car bodywork repair operation, an upmarket food wholesaler and numerous hairdressers are among the Scottish companies being named and shamed by the UK government for underpaying their workers.
More than 13,000 of the UK’s lowest paid workers, including 90 people in Scotland, will get around £2 million in back pay as part of the scheme to name employers who have failed to pay National Minimum Wage and Living Wage.
Nineteen businesses Scotland have been identified and ordered to pay their 90 workers £37,000, with hairdressing and retail businesses amongst the most prolific offenders.
Scottish Secretary of Unite Pat Rafferty, called it a “Dickensian disgrace” and urged the low paid to join his union to fight “this modern day slavery.”
The Department for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy today published a list of 233 businesses across the UK that underpaid workers.
As well as paying back staff the money owed, employers on the list have been fined a record £1.9m.
Top of the Scottish List this year was The Fish and Chip Ship Limited, in Clydebank which failed to pay £4,900.15 to nine workers. A spokeswoman for the company said “I don’t want to make any comment just now, as I have only just received the letter about this.”
Second was DSL Accident Repair Ltd, in Edinburgh who failed to pay £4,896.43 to three workers. One of the managers, who asked not to be named said “We rectified this as soon as it was discovered. It actually was a mistake by the local college who had advised us what rates to pay those who had been training. But we sorted it out very quickly.”
Then came hairdressers the Rainbow Room Limited (named changed to JPTO Ltd), in Clarkston who failed to pay £4,532.94 to 21 workers. Company director Adrian Foxworthy told the Herald his trainees’ contracts had been provided by the National Hairdressers’ Federation (NHF) which required them to be in work 15 mins early.
“Since this case they have changed all trainees’ contracts in the UK. I was fined and also had to pay the correct amount back dated to previous employees. All my employees now are not contracted to be in 15 mins early,” he said.
Meanwhile, Braehead Foods Ltd, promoted as “a fine food wholesaler and Scottish game processor who supply the best chefs in the hospitality industry across the UK and Europe”, failed to pay £3,434.39 to 28 workers. The Kilmarnock-based company was asked to comment, but did not respond.
Mr Rafferty said: “Day after day Scotland is blighted by employers determined to avoid their legal responsibilities and force their workers to accept poverty wages. Today’s list of shame is only the tip of the iceberg of what’s going on. The question is what is to be done about this Dickensian disgrace? There’s only one answer -join a trade union.”
He said 10 out of the 19 Scottish companies on the list were hairdressing firms, which seemed to be run “by modern day Mr and Mrs Micawbers.”
“The people who work for them are being forced to take an illegal wages haircut to boost their employers’ profits. Unite Scotland is campaigning today to get these workers to fight this disgrace by joining a trade union.”
The NHF was asked for a comment but did not respond.
UK Government Minister for Scotland Lord Duncan said: “To hear that there are still companies that believe they can get away with underpaying their staff is unacceptable. If it takes naming and shaming to ensure that employers wake up to their responsibilities then the UK Government will not shirk from that task. Workers need to know that we have their back on this one.”
Shadow Scotland Office Minister Paul Sweeney said: “Any trader or business found not to be paying the minimum wage should face the full force of the law."
“Labour would crack down on unscrupulous employers, ban overseas-only recruitment practices and increase prosecutions of employers evading the minimum wage.
“In addition to ensuring companies pay the minimum wage, we would increase it by creating a National Living Wage of £10 per hour as part of our plan for country that works for the many, not the few.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel