PLANS for a new village in the Highlands have been given a fresh seal of approval despite concerns raised over its impact on access r ights in the Cairngorms National Park.
T h e C a i r n g o r m s National Park Authority (CNPA) has granted plann i ng p er m i s s ion i n principle for the controversial An Camas Mor development near Aviemore for a further three years.
O u t d o o r a c c e s s campaigners, including Ramblers Scotland, had warned that proposed measures to mitigate the impact of the 1,500-home scheme on the area’s natural heritage, including important capercaillie habitats, could have a “serious impact” on walkers and cyclists.
An appraisal carried out by the CNPA suggests measures such as blocking informal parking, removing informal walking or biking routes and the deliberate re-vegetation of some paths.
The CNPA said the developers would be required to draw up a plan for mitigating the impact on capercaillie, which would be publicly consulted on before returning to the committee for discussion and a decision.
Gavin Miles, head of planning and communities, said: “Having appraised the application, the proposed development is acceptable and complies with local development plan policies.
“We are, however, recommending a suite of conditions and other measures that will manage the development.
“There is a requirement for the applicant to demonstrate that there is not a significant impact on landscape and ecology and to prove there will be no significant adverse effects to capercaillie in Badenoch and Strathspey as a result of the proposals before any development can start.”
An Camas Mor was granted planning permission in principle in 2014 but developers had applied to change a planning condition that restricted the development to 630 new homes until a review of its impact on the landscape and ecology could be carried out.
The committee approved a change to the wording of the condition to incorporate a more phased approach.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel